Architectural detail of an old mosque at Tîchît
THE SAHARA HAS LINKED rather than divided the peoples who inhabit
it and has served as an avenue for migration and conquest.
Mauritania, lying next to the Atlantic coast at the western edge
of the desert, received and assimilated into its complex society
many waves of these migrants and conquerors. Berbers moved south
to Mauritania beginning in the third century A.D., followed by
Arabs in the eighth century, subjugating and assimilating
Mauritania’s original inhabitants. From the eighth through the
fifteenth century, black kingdoms of the western Sudan, such as
Ghana, Mali, and Songhai, brought their political culture from
the south.
The divisive tendencies of the various groups within
Mauritanian society have always worked against the development of
Mauritanian unity. Both the Sanhadja Confederation, at its height
from the eighth to the tenth century, and the Almoravid Empire,
from the eleventh to the twelfth century, were weakened by
internecine warfare, and both succumbed to further invasions from
the Ghana Empire and the Almohad Empire, respectively.
The one external influence that tended to unify the country
was Islam. The Islamization of Mauritania was a gradual process
that spanned more than 500 years. Beginning slowly through
contacts with Berber and Arab merchants engaged in the important
caravan trades and rapidly advancing through the Almoravid
conquests, Islamization did not take firm hold until the arrival
of Yemeni Arabs in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries and was
not complete until several centuries later. Gradual Islamization
was accompanied by a process of arabization as well, during which
the Berber masters of Mauritania lost power and became vassals of
their Arab conquerors.
From the fifteenth to the nineteenth century, European
contact with Mauritania was dominated by the trade for
mauritania/mr_glos.asp#gum">gum arabic (see Glossary).
Rivalries among European powers enabled the Arab-Berber
population, the Maures (Moors), to maintain their
independence and later to exact annual payments from France,
whose sovereignty over the Senegal River and the Mauritanian
coast was recognized by the Congress of Vienna in 1815. Although
penetration beyond the coast and the Senegal River began in
earnest under Louis Faidherbe, governor of Senegal in the mid1800s , European conquest or "pacification" of the entire country
did not begin until 1900. Because extensive European contact
began so late in the country’s history, the traditional social
structure carried over into modern times with little change.
The history of French colonial policy in Mauritania is
closely tied to that of the other French possessions in West
Africa, particularly to that of Senegal, on which Mauritania was
economically, politically, and administratively dependent until
independence. The French policy of assimilation and direct rule,
however, was never applied with any vigor in Mauritania, where a
system that corresponded more to Britain’s colonial policies of
association and indirect rule developed. Colonial administrators
relied extensively on Islamic religious leaders and the
traditional warrior groups to maintain their rule and carry out
their policies. Moreover, little attempt was made to develop the
country’s economy.
After World War II, Mauritania, along with the rest of French
West Africa, was involved in a series of reforms of the French
colonial system, culminating in independence in 1960. These
reforms were part of a trend away from the official policies of
assimilation and direct rule in favor of administrative
decentralization and internal autonomy. Although the
nationalistic fervor sweeping French West Africa at this time was
largely absent in Mauritania, continuous politicking (averaging
one election every eighteen months between 1946 and 1958)
provided training for political leaders and awakened a political
consciousness among the populace. Nevertheless, when Mauritania
declared its independence in 1960, its level of political as well
as economic development was, at best, embryonic.
Mauritania’s postindependence history has been dominated by
regional politics
(see unavail.asp">
fig. 1). Morocco and Algeria, vying for
regional dominance, have continually influenced Mauritanian
politics and fortunes. During the first nine years of
independence, the regime of Moktar Ould Daddah was preoccupied
with expansionist designs by Morocco, whose military strength
constituted a perpetual threat to Mauritania’s territorial
integrity. This threat was intensified by the support of some of
Mauritania’s Maure population for unification with Morocco. In
1969, when Morocco finally recognized Mauritania’s ind