Skip to main content
CountryReports
AP Euro Unit 8 · Lesson 7 of 11CED Topic 8.7Skill 5.B: Making ConnectionsReasoning: Causation~ 50 min

Europe During the Interwar Period

The interwar period of 1919-1939 produced the catastrophe of the Second World War. The fragility of the Versailles settlement, the isolationism of the United States, the mutual distrust between the Western democracies and the authoritarian Soviet Union, and the rise of fascist movements in Italy and Nazi Germany combined to undermine the post-1919 European order. The chain of fascist territorial advances from the Italian invasion of Ethiopia in 1935 to the German invasion of Poland in September 1939 ran through Western failures of collective security that this lesson reconstructs.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

  • Account for how various political and ideological factors produced the catastrophe of the Second World War (Skill 5.B; LO J).
  • Account for KC-4.1.III: how interwar fascism, extreme nationalism, racist ideologies, and the failure of appeasement combined to produce the Second World War.
  • Account for KC-4.1.III.A: how French and British fears of another war, American isolationism, and Western distrust of the Soviet Union allowed the fascist states to rearm and expand their territory.
  • Connect the chain of interwar fascist territorial advances from Ethiopia in 1935 through the invasion of Poland in 1939 (Skill 5.B in direct practice).
  • Explain the political logic of appeasement, the Munich Agreement, and the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact as instruments by which Western states sought, and ultimately failed, to contain fascist expansion short of war.

Key Concepts

Topic 8.7 covers the political and ideological factors of the 1919-1939 interwar period that produced the Second World War. KC-4.1.III captures the central frame: in the interwar period, fascism, extreme nationalism, racist ideologies, and the failure of appeasement produced the catastrophe of the Second World War. The lesson covers two intersecting stories: the structural fragility of the post-1919 international order, and the chain of fascist territorial advances between 1935 and 1939 that the structural fragility allowed.

The structural fragility of the post-1919 order (KC-4.1.III). The Versailles settlement of 1919 (covered in Topic 8.4) produced a peace framework whose principal guarantors were unable, unwilling, or absent. The United States Senate rejected ratification of the Treaty of Versailles on 19 March 1920 by a vote of 49-35 (short of the two-thirds majority required), defeating Woodrow Wilson's effort to bring the United States into the League of Nations. The American withdrawal from the European order had three principal effects: the League of Nations opened in January 1920 without its principal architect; the United States and Germany signed a separate peace (the Treaty of Berlin) on 25 August 1921; and the broader pattern of American isolationism that the Senate vote symbolized continued through the 1920s and 1930s, including American non-membership in the World Court and the high tariff wall of the 1922 Fordney-McCumber Tariff and the 1930 Smoot-Hawley Tariff.

The Soviet Union sat outside the post-1919 order on different grounds. Bolshevik Russia (covered in Topic 8.3) was excluded from the Paris Peace Conference; Western expeditionary forces had intervened on the White side during the Russian Civil War; the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk in March 1918 had taken Russia out of the war on terms that the Allied powers refused to recognize; and Bolshevik calls for international communist revolution through the Comintern from March 1919 onward produced sustained Western suspicion. The Soviet Union joined the League of Nations only in September 1934 and was expelled in December 1939 after the invasion of Finland. Western distrust of the Soviet Union, and Soviet distrust of the Western democracies, ran in both directions throughout the interwar period and produced the unstable diplomatic geometry that fascist powers exploited.

France and Britain — the two principal Western European powers committed to the post-1919 settlement — were both weakened by the war and by their interwar political and economic difficulties. France had suffered approximately 1.4 million combat deaths in the war (the highest per-capita loss among the major belligerents); the war had been fought largely on French territory; the postwar reconstruction of the devastated departments of the north and east absorbed substantial public spending; and the political instability of the Third Republic (43 governments between 1918 and 1940) produced inconsistent foreign policy. The British political class was divided between a continuing imperial commitment that stretched military resources thin and a political-cultural reaction against the human cost of the 1914-1918 war that produced sustained pacifist sentiment, the 1933 Oxford Union "King and Country" debate, and the 1935 Peace Ballot in which approximately 11 million Britons indicated support for League-based collective security but only roughly 6.8 million indicated support for military action even in defense of League members.

"In the interwar period, fascism, extreme nationalism, racist ideologies, and the failure of appeasement produced the catastrophe of the Second World War."AP Euro CED, KC-4.1.III (paraphrased)

The Western response to fascist rearmament and expansion (KC-4.1.III.A). French and British fears of another war, American isolationism, and deep distrust between the Western democratic capitalist nations and the authoritarian communist Soviet Union allowed the fascist states to rearm and expand their territory. The chain of fascist advances proceeded through eight discrete crises between 1933 and 1939, each one of which presented the Western democracies with a choice between confrontation and accommodation, and in each one of which the Western democracies chose accommodation.

The first crisis was the 1933 German withdrawal from the World Disarmament Conference and from the League of Nations on 14 October 1933, less than nine months after Adolf Hitler's appointment as Chancellor on 30 January 1933. The Geneva Disarmament Conference (1932-1934) had been intended to produce a balanced reduction of European armaments; the German withdrawal effectively ended it. The Western response was a diplomatic protest without consequences. The second crisis was Hitler's announcement of conscription on 16 March 1935, openly violating the Versailles military restrictions. France, Britain, and Italy formally protested at the Stresa Conference of 11-14 April 1935 (the "Stresa Front"); the Anglo-German Naval Agreement of 18 June 1935 then undermined the Stresa Front by accepting German naval rearmament up to 35 percent of the British surface fleet, in direct contradiction of the Versailles naval restrictions.

The third crisis was Italy's invasion of Ethiopia, beginning on 3 October 1935. The League of Nations declared Italy an aggressor and imposed economic sanctions on 18 November 1935 that excluded oil, coal, iron, and steel; the Hoare-Laval Pact of December 1935 (a Franco-British proposal to partition Ethiopia in Italy's favor) was leaked to the French press and abandoned in the resulting public outcry; the Italian conquest of Addis Ababa on 5 May 1936 produced the formal annexation of Ethiopia on 9 May 1936 and the dissolution of the Stresa Front. The League of Nations had failed its first major test of collective security against an aggressor great power.

The fourth crisis was Hitler's remilitarization of the Rhineland on 7 March 1936, openly violating both the Versailles and the Locarno treaties. The German army at this point had only roughly 22,000 troops in the demilitarized zone; the French army was substantially larger and better equipped, and Hitler later admitted that a French move into the Rhineland would have produced a German withdrawal. France did not move; Britain did not press France to move; the Rhineland remained German. The fifth crisis was the Spanish Civil War of 17 July 1936 to 1 April 1939, in which Italy and Germany supported General Francisco Franco's Nationalist forces with roughly 75,000 Italian troops, the German Condor Legion (whose Junkers Ju 87 and Heinkel He 111 aircraft conducted the bombing of Guernica on 26 April 1937), and substantial military equipment. France and Britain organized a Non-Intervention Committee that the Axis powers ignored, while the Soviet Union supported the Republic with limited material and the International Brigades. Franco's victory in 1939 produced a third European fascist state.

The sixth crisis was the Anschluss with Austria on 12-13 March 1938. German troops crossed the Austrian border on the morning of 12 March 1938; Hitler entered Vienna on 14 March; the formal annexation followed a 10 April 1938 plebiscite that returned a 99.7 percent vote in favor. The Western response was a formal protest. The seventh crisis was the Sudeten crisis of summer 1938 and the Munich Agreement of 30 September 1938. The Sudeten German Party of Konrad Henlein had agitated for autonomy from Czechoslovakia since 1933; Hitler used the agitation to demand the cession of the Sudetenland. The Munich Agreement, negotiated by Hitler, Mussolini, Neville Chamberlain, and Edouard Daladier without Czechoslovak representation, transferred the Sudetenland to Germany on terms that Czechoslovakia accepted under Anglo-French pressure. Chamberlain returned to London claiming to have secured "peace for our time"; the policy of appeasement reached its high-water mark.

The Munich Agreement did not stop Hitler. On 15 March 1939 Germany occupied the rest of Czechoslovakia, dissolving the Czechoslovak state in violation of the Munich terms; the Czech lands became the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia, and Slovakia became a German client state under Jozef Tiso. The seventh crisis collapsed into the eighth: a British and French guarantee of Polish territorial integrity on 31 March 1939; an Italian invasion of Albania on 7 April 1939; the German-Italian Pact of Steel on 22 May 1939; an Anglo-French diplomatic mission to Moscow in summer 1939 that produced no agreement; and the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact of 23 August 1939, in which Germany and the Soviet Union pledged mutual non-aggression and (in a secret protocol) divided eastern Europe into German and Soviet spheres of influence. Germany invaded Poland on 1 September 1939; Britain and France declared war on Germany on 3 September 1939; the European war that the Versailles settlement had been intended to prevent had arrived.

The Skill 5.B argument. Topic 8.7's suggested skill is 5.B (Making Connections: account for the way one historical development or process is tied to another). The skill applies in two principal ways. First, students should connect the chain of fascist territorial advances between 1935 and 1939 as a single linked process rather than as eight unrelated events. Each Western accommodation lowered the perceived cost of the next fascist advance and raised the eventual cost of confrontation. Second, students should connect the political-ideological development of fascism (covered in Topic 8.6) and the structural-economic instability of the interwar economy (covered in Topic 8.5) to the geopolitical outcome that Topic 8.7 addresses: the catastrophe of the Second World War that Topic 8.8 will examine in its military phase.

Primary Source Excerpts

Three sources framing the interwar diplomatic chain: an early statement of postwar reconciliation, the high-water mark of appeasement, and the diplomatic reversal that opened the road to war.

Treaty Avalon Project, Yale 1925

Treaty of Mutual Guarantee, Locarno, 16 October 1925

"Germany and Belgium, and also Germany and France, mutually undertake that they will in no case attack or invade each other or resort to war against each other... The provisions of this article do not, however, apply in the case of: (1) the exercise of the right of legitimate defence... (2) action in pursuance of Article 16 of the Covenant of the League of Nations... The High Contracting Parties guarantee individually and collectively the maintenance of the territorial status quo resulting from the frontiers between Germany and Belgium and between Germany and France."

The Locarno Treaties of 16 October 1925 produced a set of seven mutually reinforcing agreements among Germany, France, Belgium, Britain, and Italy that guaranteed the western frontiers of the Versailles settlement and provided arbitration mechanisms for disputes among the signatories. The treaties were negotiated by German Foreign Minister Gustav Stresemann (who shared the 1926 Nobel Peace Prize with French Foreign Minister Aristide Briand for the Locarno settlement); they were widely understood at the time as marking a new "spirit of Locarno" of European reconciliation. Germany joined the League of Nations as a permanent member of the Council on 8 September 1926. For Topic 8.7 the source documents the optimistic phase of the interwar diplomatic order whose collapse KC-4.1.III addresses; the Locarno settlement's western frontiers were the precise frontiers that Hitler violated by remilitarizing the Rhineland on 7 March 1936.

"Treaty of Mutual Guarantee between Germany, Belgium, France, Great Britain, and Italy, Locarno, 16 October 1925," Articles 1-2, in The Treaties of Locarno, League of Nations Treaty Series, vol. 54 (1926), no. 1292. View at the Avalon Project →
Diplomatic Agreement Avalon Project, Yale 1938

Munich Agreement, 30 September 1938

"Germany, the United Kingdom, France and Italy, taking into consideration the agreement, which has been already reached in principle for the cession to Germany of the Sudeten German territory, have agreed on the following terms and conditions governing the said cession and the measures consequent thereon, and by this agreement they each hold themselves responsible for the steps necessary to secure its fulfillment: (1) The evacuation will begin on 1st October. (2) The United Kingdom, France and Italy agree that the evacuation of the territory shall be completed by the 10th October, without any existing installations having been destroyed."

The Munich Agreement of 30 September 1938 was the culmination of the Sudeten crisis of summer 1938. The agreement was negotiated overnight at Hitler's residence at the Fuehrerbau in Munich among Hitler, Mussolini, British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, and French Premier Edouard Daladier; Czechoslovak representatives were present in Munich but were excluded from the negotiating session. The Sudetenland (with its population of approximately 3.5 million ethnic Germans and approximately 800,000 Czechs) was transferred to Germany between 1 October and 10 October 1938. Czechoslovak President Edvard Benes resigned on 5 October 1938 and went into exile in London. Chamberlain returned to Heston Aerodrome on 30 September 1938 holding a separate Anglo-German declaration that he described as guaranteeing "peace for our time"; Hitler occupied the rest of Czechoslovakia on 15 March 1939. For Topic 8.7 the source documents the high-water mark of the appeasement policy that KC-4.1.III.A identifies as enabling fascist territorial expansion.

"Agreement Concluded at Munich, September 29, 1938, Between Germany, Great Britain, France, and Italy," in Documents on German Foreign Policy 1918-1945, Series D (1937-1945), vol. 2 (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1949), pp. 1014-1016. View at the Avalon Project →
Treaty Avalon Project, Yale 1939

Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact (Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact), 23 August 1939

"The Government of the German Reich and the Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, desirous of strengthening the cause of peace between Germany and the U.S.S.R., and proceeding from the fundamental provisions of the Neutrality Agreement concluded in April 1926 between Germany and the U.S.S.R., have reached the following agreement: Article I. Both High Contracting Parties obligate themselves to desist from any act of violence, any aggressive action, and any attack on each other, either individually or jointly with other Powers... Article IV. Should disputes or conflicts arise between the High Contracting Parties shall participate in no grouping of powers whatsoever that is directly or indirectly aimed at the other party."

The Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact (the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact) was signed in Moscow on 23 August 1939 by German Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop and Soviet Foreign Minister Vyacheslav Molotov, in Stalin's presence. The pact's secret protocol divided eastern Europe into German and Soviet spheres of influence: Finland, Estonia, Latvia, and the eastern regions of Poland fell into the Soviet sphere; Lithuania (initially) and the western regions of Poland fell into the German sphere; Romania's Bessarabia was assigned to the Soviet sphere. The pact removed the threat of a two-front war for Germany, allowed Hitler to invade Poland on 1 September 1939, and produced a Soviet invasion of eastern Poland on 17 September 1939, a Soviet invasion of Finland on 30 November 1939 (the Winter War), and Soviet annexations of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Romanian Bessarabia in summer 1940. The pact ended on 22 June 1941 when Germany invaded the Soviet Union under Operation Barbarossa. The Soviet government denied the existence of the secret protocol until 1989. For Topic 8.7 the source documents the diplomatic reversal that broke the last possibility of an Anglo-French-Soviet front against Nazi Germany and that triggered the Second World War nine days after its signature.

"Treaty of Non-Aggression Between Germany and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, 23 August 1939," in Nazi-Soviet Relations 1939-1941: Documents from the Archives of the German Foreign Office, Raymond James Sontag and James Stuart Beddie, eds. (Washington: Department of State, 1948), pp. 76-78. View at the Avalon Project →

Discussion Questions

  1. (Causation, Skill 5.B) Connect the structural fragility of the post-1919 international order — American absence, Soviet exclusion, and Anglo-French weakness — to the geopolitical opening that fascist states exploited between 1935 and 1939. Cite specific institutional and political factors.
  2. (Causation) Account for KC-4.1.III.A: how did French and British fears of another war, American isolationism, and Western distrust of the Soviet Union allow the fascist states to rearm and expand? Cite the German withdrawal from the League in 1933, the Anglo-German Naval Agreement of 1935, and the Hoare-Laval Pact of December 1935.
  3. (Causation, Skill 5.B) Connect the chain of fascist territorial advances from the Italian invasion of Ethiopia (October 1935) through the German invasion of Poland (September 1939) as a single linked process rather than as eight unrelated events. What is the principal feature that links them?
  4. (Causation) Account for the political logic of the Munich Agreement on 30 September 1938 from the British and French perspectives. Why was appeasement defensible at the time, and why did it fail?
  5. (Causation, Skill 5.B) Connect the Anglo-French diplomatic mission to Moscow in summer 1939 and the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact of 23 August 1939. What does the failure of the Anglo-French-Soviet negotiations reveal about the structural geometry that KC-4.1.III.A identifies?

Classroom Activities

25 min

Eight-Crisis Chain Workshop

On the board, draw a horizontal timeline from 1933 to 1939. In small groups, students place the eight fascist crises (German withdrawal from the League 1933; rearmament announcement 1935; Italian invasion of Ethiopia 1935; Rhineland remilitarization 1936; Spanish Civil War 1936-1939; Anschluss 1938; Munich Agreement 1938; occupation of the rest of Czechoslovakia and the Polish invasion 1939) on the timeline and identify the Western response to each. The activity makes Skill 5.B's "connect one development to another" concrete: each accommodation lowered the perceived cost of the next advance.

20 min

Three Voices Source Reading

Distribute the Locarno Treaty (October 1925), Munich Agreement (September 1938), and Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact (August 1939) excerpts as a chronological sequence. In pairs, students identify the political voice and historical position of each: the optimistic post-1919 reconciliation, the appeasement settlement, and the diplomatic reversal. The fourteen-year arc from Locarno to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact frames the decline of the post-1919 international order.

15 min

Counterfactual on the Rhineland (March 1936)

In pairs, students argue the case that a French military move into the Rhineland on 7 March 1936 would have produced a German withdrawal and a substantially different interwar trajectory. What political, military, and diplomatic factors prevented the move? Hitler's later admission of his expectation of a French response is the principal evidence; the French electoral cycle (Popular Front election scheduled for April-May 1936), Anglo-French disagreement, and the absence of an Italian guarantee after the Ethiopian crisis are the principal counter-arguments.

20 min

Map of European Frontiers, 1919-1939

Distribute two maps of Europe: 1919 frontiers and August 1939 frontiers. In small groups, students identify the territorial changes between the two maps and assign each change to one of the eight crises (the Saar plebiscite 1935; Rhineland 1936; Anschluss 1938; Sudetenland 1938; rest of Czechoslovakia 1939; Memel 1939; Albania 1939). The activity makes the cumulative territorial logic of the chain of fascist advances visible at a glance.

Vocabulary

International organization established by the Treaty of Versailles in 1919 and headquartered at Geneva. Designed by Woodrow Wilson and others as the principal institutional vehicle of post-1919 collective security. Opened in January 1920 without American membership after the United States Senate rejected ratification of the Treaty of Versailles. Failed its first major collective-security test against Italy over Ethiopia in 1935-1936; effectively defunct from 1939 onward; formally dissolved in April 1946.
United States foreign-policy posture of non-entanglement in European political and military affairs that ran from the Senate's rejection of the Versailles Treaty in March 1920 through the formal entry of the United States into the Second World War in December 1941. Anchored in the Neutrality Acts of 1935, 1936, 1937, and 1939; partially relaxed by the Lend-Lease Act of March 1941. Ended by the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on 7 December 1941 and the German declaration of war on the United States on 11 December 1941.
Set of seven mutually reinforcing agreements signed at Locarno, Switzerland, on 16 October 1925, among Germany, France, Belgium, Britain, and Italy. Guaranteed the western frontiers of the Versailles settlement and provided arbitration mechanisms for disputes. Negotiated principally by German Foreign Minister Gustav Stresemann and French Foreign Minister Aristide Briand (joint Nobel Peace Prize, 1926). Frequently cited as the high-water mark of the optimistic interwar diplomatic order. Effectively annulled by Hitler's remilitarization of the Rhineland on 7 March 1936.
Multilateral treaty signed in Paris on 27 August 1928 in which the principal world powers renounced war as an instrument of national policy. Negotiated by United States Secretary of State Frank Kellogg and French Foreign Minister Aristide Briand. Eventually signed by 62 states. Provided no enforcement mechanism; cited by the prosecution at the Nuremberg trials of 1945-1946 as legal grounds for charging Nazi leaders with crimes against peace.
British and French foreign-policy approach toward Nazi Germany during the 1930s that sought to address Hitler's territorial demands through diplomatic concession rather than confrontation. Reached its high-water mark at the Munich Agreement of 30 September 1938. Discredited by the German occupation of the rest of Czechoslovakia on 15 March 1939. The term became substantially pejorative after 1939 and remains a contested keyword in subsequent foreign-policy debates.
British Conservative politician; Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from May 1937 to May 1940. Principal British architect of the appeasement policy and of the Munich Agreement of September 1938. Returned to London on 30 September 1938 holding a separate Anglo-German declaration that he described as guaranteeing "peace for our time." Resigned on 10 May 1940 in favor of Winston Churchill after the German invasion of France and the Low Countries; died of cancer on 9 November 1940.
French Radical politician; Premier of France from April 1938 to March 1940. Co-signed the Munich Agreement of 30 September 1938 with Chamberlain, Hitler, and Mussolini. More skeptical of appeasement than Chamberlain but committed to a coordinated Anglo-French response. Replaced by Paul Reynaud in March 1940; arrested by the Vichy government in September 1940 and tried at the Riom trials of February-April 1942; held by the Germans at Buchenwald and Itter; survived the war.
Austrian-born leader of the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP) from 1921. Appointed Chancellor of Germany on 30 January 1933 and assumed the combined title of Fuhrer and Reichskanzler on 2 August 1934 after the death of President Paul von Hindenburg. Principal architect of the chain of fascist territorial expansion between 1933 and 1939 that produced the Second World War. Killed himself in the Fuhrerbunker in Berlin on 30 April 1945. Specific lesson of fascist political thought: covered in Topic 8.6.
Italian Fascist politician; Prime Minister of Italy from October 1922 and Duce of the Italian Social Republic from September 1943 to April 1945. Ordered the invasion of Ethiopia in October 1935; co-signed the Munich Agreement in September 1938 as the broker between Hitler, Chamberlain, and Daladier; joined the Pact of Steel with Germany in May 1939; declared war on France and Britain on 10 June 1940. Captured by Italian partisans on 27 April 1945 and executed at Giulino di Mezzegra on 28 April 1945.
German military reoccupation of the Rhineland on 7 March 1936, in violation of both the Treaty of Versailles and the Locarno Treaties of 1925. Approximately 22,000 German troops moved into the demilitarized zone; standing French and Belgian forces were substantially larger. France did not move; Britain did not press France to move. Hitler later admitted that a French move into the Rhineland would have produced a German withdrawal. Conventionally treated as the moment at which Western collective security against Germany became substantially untenable.
Spanish military and political conflict from 17 July 1936 to 1 April 1939 between Republican forces and the Nationalist forces of General Francisco Franco. Italy and Germany substantially supported the Nationalists with troops, aircraft (including the German Condor Legion responsible for the bombing of Guernica on 26 April 1937), and military equipment. The Soviet Union supported the Republic with limited material and the International Brigades. Britain and France organized a Non-Intervention Committee that the Axis powers ignored. Franco's victory in 1939 produced a third European fascist regime.
German military and political annexation of Austria on 12-13 March 1938. German troops crossed the Austrian border on the morning of 12 March 1938; Hitler entered Vienna on 14 March 1938; the formal annexation followed a 10 April 1938 plebiscite that returned a 99.7 percent vote in favor. Western response: a formal protest. The Anschluss substantially extended German territorial reach into central Europe and isolated Czechoslovakia geographically.
Diplomatic crisis of summer 1938 over German demands for the cession of the Sudetenland (the German-majority border regions of Czechoslovakia). The Sudeten German Party of Konrad Henlein had agitated for autonomy from Czechoslovakia since 1933; Hitler used the agitation to demand cession. Resolved at the Munich Agreement of 30 September 1938. The cession transferred a population of approximately 3.5 million ethnic Germans and approximately 800,000 Czechs to Germany.
Diplomatic settlement signed at the Fuehrerbau in Munich on the morning of 30 September 1938 by Hitler, Mussolini, Chamberlain, and Daladier (Czechoslovak representatives were excluded from the negotiating session). Authorized German annexation of the Sudetenland between 1 and 10 October 1938. Conventionally treated as the high-water mark of the appeasement policy. Annulled by the German occupation of the rest of Czechoslovakia on 15 March 1939.
Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact signed in Moscow on 23 August 1939 by German Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop and Soviet Foreign Minister Vyacheslav Molotov. The treaty's secret protocol divided eastern Europe into German and Soviet spheres of influence. Removed the threat of a two-front war for Germany, allowing the invasion of Poland on 1 September 1939. Ended on 22 June 1941 with the German invasion of the Soviet Union (Operation Barbarossa). The secret protocol was officially denied by the Soviet government until 1989.
AP European History historical thinking skill: account for the way one historical development or process is tied to another. The suggested skill for Topic 8.7; especially appropriate for connecting the chain of fascist territorial advances from 1935 to 1939 as a linked process rather than as discrete events.
One of the three AP European History reasoning processes (alongside Comparison and Continuity and Change). Tasks students with identifying causes and effects of historical events, developments, or processes. The dominant reasoning process for Topic 8.7: the political and ideological factors that produced the Second World War.

Standards Alignment

Draft alignment — pending educator review. AP European History codes correspond to the official College Board Course and Exam Description (Effective Fall 2023, V.1). Statements below are paraphrased in the CountryReports voice; refer to the College Board's published CED for verbatim wording.

AP European History CED-ALIGNED

Thematic Focus

SOPStates and Other Institutions of Power — the structural fragility of the post-1919 international order, the rise of fascist states, and the chain of territorial expansion between 1935 and 1939 that produced the Second World War.

Historical Thinking Skill and Reasoning Process

Skill 5.BAccount for the way one historical development or process is tied to another. (Skill category 5: Making Connections.)
Reasoning 2Causation — describe causes and effects of historical events, developments, or processes.

Learning Objective

LO 8.JAccount for how various political and ideological factors produced the catastrophe of the Second World War.

Key Concepts

KC-4.1.IIIIn the interwar period, fascism, extreme nationalism, racist ideologies, and the failure of appeasement produced the catastrophe of the Second World War.
KC-4.1.III.AFrench and British fears of another war, American isolationism, and deep distrust between Western democratic capitalist nations and the authoritarian communist Soviet Union allowed fascist states to rearm and expand their territory.
National Cross-Walks
NCSS Theme 6Power, Authority, and Governance — the structural fragility of the post-1919 international order, the rise of fascist states, and the failure of collective security through the League of Nations.
NCSS Theme 9Global Connections — the linked chain of fascist territorial advances between 1935 and 1939 across the Mediterranean, central Europe, and eastern Europe.
C3 D2.His.14.9-12Analyze multiple and complex causes and effects of events in the past.
C3 D2.Civ.13.9-12Evaluate public policies in terms of intended and unintended outcomes, and related consequences.
CCSS RH.11-12.7Integrate and evaluate multiple sources of information presented in diverse formats and media in order to address a question or solve a problem.
Discipline-Specific National Standards
NSH Era 8 · Std 4Examine the structural fragility of the post-1919 international order: American isolationism after the Senate's rejection of the Treaty of Versailles in March 1920; the exclusion of the Soviet Union from the European order; the political and economic weakness of France and Britain.
NSH Era 8 · Std 4AExamine the chain of fascist territorial advances from the Italian invasion of Ethiopia in October 1935 through the German invasion of Poland on 1 September 1939, including the Anglo-German Naval Agreement, the remilitarization of the Rhineland, the Spanish Civil War, the Anschluss, the Munich Agreement, and the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.
Other Assessment Frameworks
AP US HistoryCross-reference Period 7 (1890-1945) — American isolationism in the interwar period, the Senate's rejection of the Versailles Treaty in March 1920, the Neutrality Acts of 1935-1939, the Lend-Lease Act of March 1941, and the eventual American entry into the war after Pearl Harbor on 7 December 1941.
AP World HistoryCross-reference Unit 7 (Global Conflict) — the global character of the chain of fascist territorial advances; the Italian conquest of Ethiopia; the Japanese invasion of Manchuria in 1931 and of China proper from 1937; the German-Italian-Japanese Anti-Comintern Pact of 1936-1937; the Tripartite Pact of September 1940.
AP Comparative GovernmentCross-reference foundational concepts — the post-1919 European multistate system, the structural conditions of collective security, the failure of the League of Nations as a collective-security institution, and the long-running political-theoretical debate over the conditions under which alliance commitments are credible.

AP Practice Questions

Multiple Choice Sample ~ 2 min
1Question: Which of the following best accounts for the Western failure to halt the chain of fascist territorial advances between 1935 and 1939?
  • (A) The Western democracies were militarily unable to oppose Germany at any point between 1933 and 1939.
  • (B) French and British fears of another European war on the scale of 1914-1918, American isolationism after the Senate's rejection of the Versailles Treaty, and Western distrust of the Soviet Union combined to allow fascist states to rearm and expand (KC-4.1.III.A).
  • (C) The League of Nations successfully imposed comprehensive collective-security measures that fascist states ignored.
  • (D) The principal cause of the Second World War was the over-aggressive Anglo-French response to German revisionist demands.
  • (E) The chain of fascist territorial advances was the unintended consequence of the Locarno Treaties of 1925.

Correct: (B). KC-4.1.III.A captures the central pattern: French and British war-aversion, American isolationism, and Western-Soviet distrust combined to produce the geometry of accommodation that fascist states exploited. (A) overstates Western military weakness: in March 1936 a French move into the Rhineland would, by Hitler's own later admission, have produced a German withdrawal. (C) inverts the historical record: the League's collective-security mechanism failed in Manchuria in 1931-1933, in Ethiopia in 1935-1936, and over the Spanish Civil War in 1936-1939. (D) reverses the historical consensus on appeasement. (E) misreads the Locarno settlement, which guaranteed western frontiers that Hitler then violated. (LO J; Skill 5.B; Reasoning Process: Causation).

Short Answer Question ~ 12 min · 1 page
2Question: Using your knowledge of European history between roughly 1933 and 1939, answer all three parts that follow.
  1. Identify ONE specific structural factor of the post-1919 international order that allowed fascist territorial expansion.
  2. Explain ONE specific Western accommodation between 1935 and 1938 that lowered the perceived cost of subsequent fascist advances.
  3. Explain ONE specific way that the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact of 23 August 1939 made the German invasion of Poland on 1 September 1939 more likely.

Scoring: 1 point for each part. Strong responses to part (a) might cite the United States Senate's rejection of the Treaty of Versailles in March 1920; the absence of the Soviet Union from the post-1919 European order; the political instability of the French Third Republic; or the British political-cultural reaction against the human cost of the 1914-1918 war that produced sustained pacifist sentiment (KC-4.1.III.A). Part (b) responses might cite the Anglo-German Naval Agreement of 18 June 1935 (accepting German naval rearmament); the Hoare-Laval Pact of December 1935 (proposing the partition of Ethiopia in Italy's favor); the absence of a Western response to the Rhineland remilitarization on 7 March 1936; the Non-Intervention Committee on Spain after July 1936; the Anschluss with Austria in March 1938; or the Munich Agreement of 30 September 1938 (KC-4.1.III). Part (c) responses might cite the removal of the threat of a two-front war for Germany; the secret protocol's division of eastern Europe into German and Soviet spheres; or the consequent collapse of the Anglo-French diplomatic effort in Moscow in summer 1939 to construct an Anglo-French-Soviet front against Nazi Germany.

Document-Based Question Stem ~ 60 min · 7 documents
3Prompt: Account for the political and ideological factors that produced the Second World War between 1933 and 1939. In your response, draw evidence from the seven documents and from your own knowledge of the period.

The full seven-document set for this DBQ lives in the Unit 8 practice exam packet (Document A: Locarno Treaty excerpts, October 1925; Document B: Hitler, Reichstag speech proclaiming German rearmament, March 1935; Document C: Hoare-Laval Pact press leak, December 1935; Document D: League of Nations debate on Ethiopia, 1935-1936; Document E: Munich Agreement excerpts, 30 September 1938; Document F: Chamberlain "peace for our time" statement, 30 September 1938; Document G: Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact and secret protocol, 23 August 1939).

Scoring framework: 1 point thesis, 1 point contextualization, up to 4 points evidence (at least 3 documents used to support the argument, plus an outside-evidence point), 1 point sourcing (point of view, purpose, situation, audience for at least three documents), 1 point complexity. Maximum 7 points. The default reasoning process is Causation; strong responses identify the structural conditions of the post-1919 order (KC-4.1.III.A) and the chain of fascist territorial advances (KC-4.1.III). The complexity point is most often earned by integrating the structural factors (American absence, Soviet exclusion, Anglo-French weakness) with the political-ideological factors (fascism, extreme nationalism, racist ideologies) and recognizing that neither set of factors was sufficient to produce the war on its own.

Long Essay Question Stem ~ 40 min
4Prompt: Account for how the chain of fascist territorial advances between 1935 and 1939 produced the Second World War. Defend a clear claim with specific historical evidence.

Scoring framework: 1 point thesis, 1 point contextualization, 2 points evidence (at least two pieces of specific historical evidence, one of which directly supports the argument), 1 point analysis using the Causation reasoning process, 1 point complexity. Maximum 6 points. The complexity point is most often earned by treating the chain of fascist advances as a linked process rather than as eight unrelated events. Strong responses identify specific links: the Italian invasion of Ethiopia in October 1935 demonstrated League weakness; the Rhineland remilitarization in March 1936 demonstrated French and British unwillingness to confront Germany; the Anschluss in March 1938 demonstrated the same pattern with respect to Austria; the Munich Agreement in September 1938 demonstrated that even formal territorial guarantees could be revised under threat; the German occupation of the rest of Czechoslovakia in March 1939 demonstrated the failure of appeasement; and the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact in August 1939 closed the last possibility of a multilateral counterweight. Each accommodation lowered the perceived cost of the next fascist advance and raised the eventual cost of confrontation. (LO J; Skill 5.B; Reasoning Process: Causation).