Skip to main content
CountryReports
AP Euro Unit 5 · Lesson 9 of 9CED Topic 5.9Skill 5.A: Making ConnectionsReasoning: Continuity and Change~ 50 min

Continuity and Change in 18th-Century States

Unit 5 closes by asking students to construct a continuity-and-change argument: how did the developments and challenges to the European political order produce change between 1648 and 1815, and what persisted unchanged? The French Revolution and Napoleon's empire mounted fundamental challenges to the existing order; the Vienna settlement attempted to restore much of it; Britain rose to maritime primacy; Romanticism and religious revival challenged Enlightenment rationality without displacing it. Topic 5.9 asks students to identify the substantial changes alongside the substantial continuities and to use Skill 5.A to draw connections among them.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

  • Account for how the developments and challenges to the political order produced change between 1648 and 1815 (LO J; Skill 5.A; KC-2.1).
  • Identify the principal substantial changes the late-eighteenth-century revolutionary crisis produced (KC-2.1.IV French Revolution, KC-2.1.V Napoleon, KC-2.1.III.D British rise) and the principal substantial continuities (Bourbon Restoration, persistence of monarchy, Russian serfdom).
  • Account for the connections among the political (KC-2.1.IV-V), economic (KC-2.2.III), intellectual (KC-2.3.VI), and cultural threads of Unit 5.
  • Use Skill 5.A (Making Connections) to identify patterns connecting Unit 5's diverse developments into a coherent continuity-and-change argument.
  • Connect Unit 5's late-eighteenth-century crisis to Unit 4's Enlightenment background and to Unit 6's nineteenth-century industrial transformation.

Key Concepts

Topic 5.9 closes Unit 5 by asking students to construct a continuity-and-change argument across the unit's principal threads. The unit covered the late-eighteenth-century European political and intellectual crisis. KC-2.1 captures the broad framing: different models of political sovereignty shaped the relationship among states and between states and individuals. Across 1648-1815, those models came under sustained challenge: the French Revolution mounted a fundamental challenge to Bourbon ancien-régime political and social order; Napoleon's empire spread revolutionary legal codes across Europe; Britain rose to global maritime and commercial primacy; Romanticism and religious revival challenged Enlightenment rationality; the Vienna settlement attempted to restore the older dynastic system while accommodating substantial revolutionary transformation.

The substantial changes ran along multiple axes. Politically: the Bourbon ancien régime collapsed in 1789 (KC-2.1.IV.A); feudal privileges and seigneurial obligations were legally abolished in France on 4 August 1789 and across Napoleonic Europe (KC-2.1.IV.B); the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man articulated natural-rights doctrine that overturned divine-right absolutism; the 1791 and 1793 Constitutions established (briefly) constitutional monarchy and (then) republic; the radical Jacobin Republic and Reign of Terror (KC-2.1.IV.C) produced the first modern citizen-army through the August 1793 levée en masse (KC-2.1.IV.D); Napoleon's 1804 Civil Code (KC-2.1.V.A) codified revolutionary legal principles for adult men across Napoleonic Europe; the Holy Roman Empire dissolved in 1806 and was replaced by the German Confederation in 1815. Economically and commercially: the Anglo-French rivalry ended with British global maritime primacy (KC-2.1.III.D); the Atlantic slave-labor system began to be challenged by abolitionism (the British 1807 abolition of the slave trade; the Haitian Revolution producing the only successful slave revolt in modern history, KC-2.1.IV.F).

Continuing the inventory of substantial changes: religiously, the 1790 Civil Constitution of the Clergy nationalized the French Catholic Church; the 1801 Concordat reconciled state and Roman Catholic Church on new terms; the 1781 Edict of Toleration in Habsburg Austria and the French 1787 Edict of Versailles extended religious toleration; the Methodist religious revival under John Wesley produced a new working-class Protestant movement (KC-2.3.VI.C). Nationally: nationalism emerged as a new political force in Spain (Peninsular War), the German states (Fichte's Addresses; Prussian reforms), Russia (1812 patriotic resistance), and (later) Italy and Greece (KC-2.1.V.C); the basic vocabulary of modern political ideology (liberalism, conservatism, socialism, republicanism) emerged from the French Revolution and the debate over its meaning (KC-2.1.IV.G). Culturally: Romanticism challenged Enlightenment rationality in literature, music, religion, and political thought (KC-2.3.VI); the modern autobiographical tradition (Rousseau's Confessions); the modern historical novel (Walter Scott); and the modern cultural-nationalist movement (Fichte, the Romantic poets) all emerged in this period.

"Different models of political sovereignty shaped the relationship among states and between states and individuals."AP Euro CED, KC-2.1 (paraphrased)

The substantial continuities ran alongside these changes. Most European monarchies were restored after 1814-1815: the Bourbons in France (Louis XVIII, then Charles X, then the July Monarchy of 1830), Spain (Ferdinand VII), and the Two Sicilies; the House of Savoy in Sardinia-Piedmont; the Italian dynasties; the Habsburg, Hohenzollern, and Romanov dynasties continued their rule. The 1815 Vienna settlement (KC-2.1.V.D) explicitly invoked legitimacy as a settlement principle. Serfdom persisted in Russia until 1861 and in many eastern and central European territories well into the nineteenth century. Even where Napoleon had abolished serfdom in his satellite kingdoms (the 1807 Prussian reforms; the Habsburg Joseph II's 1781 Patent), the underlying landlord-peasant relations often continued in modified form. The Atlantic slave-labor system continued in the British and French Caribbean (until 1833 and 1848 respectively) and in Brazil and Cuba into the late nineteenth century. Most European peasants in 1815 still farmed under traditional obligations modified but not eliminated.

Other substantial continuities: the Catholic Church remained a major political and cultural force even after the Concordat; the post-1815 Catholic revival (Chateaubriand, the papal politics of Gregory XVI and Pius IX) reasserted Catholic authority across Catholic Europe. The European balance-of-power diplomatic system, ratified at Westphalia in 1648 and refined at Utrecht in 1713 (Topic 3.6), continued to organize post-Vienna international politics through the Concert of Europe (Topic 5.7). Patriarchal authority over women in the legal-civil sphere actually intensified under the Napoleonic Civil Code (Topic 5.6); Wollstonecraft's and de Gouges's revolutionary-era arguments for women's political equality (Topics 4.3 and 5.4) did not produce institutional change in the Napoleonic period or under the post-Vienna restored monarchies. Atlantic and European commercial structures continued: most overseas trade still moved through pre-industrial sail-and-cart infrastructure; the British Industrial Revolution had begun in late-eighteenth-century Lancashire but had not yet transformed the broader European economy.

The connections among Unit 5's developments — what Skill 5.A asks students to identify — run in several specific directions. The Anglo-French rivalry (Topics 5.2-5.3) produced both the British 1763 victory and the French fiscal collapse that contributed to the 1789 Revolution (Topic 5.4). The French Revolution (Topic 5.4) produced both the Haitian Revolution (Topic 5.5) and the Napoleonic empire (Topic 5.6). Napoleonic empire-building (Topic 5.6) produced the nationalist responses (Topic 5.6) and the Vienna settlement (Topic 5.7) responding to its collapse. Romanticism (Topic 5.8) was both a response to Enlightenment rationality (Unit 4) and a parallel cultural development to the political crisis. The Vienna settlement (Topic 5.7) explicitly attempted to contain the revolutionary and nationalist forces the Revolution and Napoleon had unleashed; its partial success and partial failure shaped post-1815 European politics through 1848.

Topic 5.9's central message is that the late-eighteenth-century European political and intellectual crisis produced both substantial transformation and substantial continuity. The post-Vienna European order of 1815 differed substantially from the European order of 1648 in legal codes, political institutions, intellectual frameworks, and international relations; it also retained substantial continuities in monarchy, ecclesiastical authority, social hierarchy, and gendered legal status. Unit 6's nineteenth-century industrialization and Unit 7's nineteenth-century political developments will trace how the post-Vienna settlement gradually broke down across the nineteenth century, producing the modern European order through the 1848 revolutions, the unification movements, and the rise of mass politics.

Primary Source Excerpts

Three sources framing Unit 5's continuity-and-change argument: the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man, Napoleon's 1804 Civil Code, and the 1815 Holy Alliance. Read together, the three documents trace the unit's arc from revolution through Napoleonic codification to conservative restoration.

Declaration Internet History Sourcebooks 1789

Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, 26 August 1789

"Men are born and remain free and equal in rights. Social distinctions may be founded only upon the general good. The aim of all political association is the preservation of the natural and imprescriptible rights of man. These rights are liberty, property, security, and resistance to oppression. The principle of all sovereignty resides essentially in the nation. No body nor individual may exercise any authority which does not proceed directly from the nation."

The August 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen articulated the foundational revolutionary principles: natural equality of all men, protection of natural rights as the purpose of political association, and the location of sovereignty in the nation rather than in a hereditary monarch. The Declaration was incorporated into the 1791 Constitution as a preamble and remains foundational to modern French constitutional law. For Topic 5.9 the source represents the moment of revolutionary challenge to the existing political and social order — the substantial change that Unit 5 traces. Read alongside the Civil Code and the Holy Alliance, it lets students see how revolutionary principles were partially codified by Napoleon and partially restored against by the post-Vienna settlement.

Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, 26 August 1789, in Archives Parlementaires, vol. 8 (Paris: P. Dupont, 1875). Internet History Sourcebooks (Fordham University). View at Internet History Sourcebooks →
Code Internet History Sourcebooks 1804

The Napoleonic Civil Code, Title Preliminary, 1804

"Article 1: The laws shall be obligatory in all the French territory, by virtue of their promulgation by the First Consul... Article 7: The exercise of civil rights is independent of the quality of citizen, which is acquired and preserved only conformably to the constitutional law. Article 8: Every Frenchman shall enjoy civil rights... Article 213: The husband owes protection to his wife, and the wife obedience to her husband."

The 1804 Civil Code (Code Napoleon) codified French civil law along revolutionary lines: legal uniformity across the French territory; equality before the law for all French citizens (Article 8); civil rights independent of birth or estate (Article 7). The same Code, however, sharply restricted married women's legal rights (Article 213). The combination — egalitarian among adult men, patriarchal toward women — was the canonical Napoleonic pattern. The Code spread across Napoleonic Europe and remained in force in Belgium, Luxembourg, parts of Germany and Italy, Louisiana, and elsewhere into the present. For Topic 5.9 the source illustrates the partial codification of revolutionary principles that survived Napoleon's defeat. Read alongside the 1789 Declaration and the 1815 Holy Alliance, it reveals the partial change-and-continuity character of the Unit 5 trajectory.

French Civil Code (1804), in The Code Napoléon, trans. George Spence (London: William Benning, 1827). Internet History Sourcebooks (Fordham University). View at Internet History Sourcebooks →
Treaty Internet History Sourcebooks 1815

The Holy Alliance, 26 September 1815

"In the name of the Most Holy and Indivisible Trinity... Their Majesties the Emperor of Austria, the King of Prussia, and the Emperor of Russia... solemnly declare that the present Act has no other object than to publish, in the face of the whole world, their fixed resolution... to take for their sole guide the precepts of that Holy Religion, namely, the precepts of Justice, Christian Charity, and Peace, which... must have an immediate influence on the councils of Princes."

The September 1815 Holy Alliance, signed by the Russian, Austrian, and Prussian sovereigns, framed the post-Vienna conservative international order in mystical Christian terms. Tsar Alexander I drafted the treaty; the other monarchs accepted it reluctantly. Most other European monarchies eventually joined; principal exceptions were Britain, the Papal States, and the Ottoman Sultan. British Foreign Secretary Castlereagh dismissed it as “sublime mysticism and nonsense.” The Holy Alliance had limited practical effect but symbolized the post-Vienna conservative monarchical solidarity that the Concert of Europe institutionalized. For Topic 5.9 the source represents the conservative attempt to restore the older European order against revolutionary and Napoleonic transformation. Read alongside the 1789 Declaration and the 1804 Civil Code, it reveals the partial-restoration character of the Vienna settlement: conservative dynasties restored, but unable to undo many of the revolutionary and Napoleonic changes.

The Holy Alliance, 26 September 1815, in British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 2 (London: HMSO, 1838). Internet History Sourcebooks (Fordham University). View at Internet History Sourcebooks →

Discussion Questions

  1. (Continuity and Change, Skill 5.A) Construct an argument: how did the developments and challenges to the political order produce change between 1648 and 1815, and what persisted? What specific evidence drawn from across Unit 5 best supports your continuity-and-change thesis?
  2. (Continuity and Change) Account for the principal substantial changes Unit 5 traces (KC-2.1.IV French Revolution, KC-2.1.V Napoleon, KC-2.1.III.D British rise, KC-2.3.VI Romanticism). Identify three changes that lasted into the post-1815 European order.
  3. (Continuity and Change) Account for the principal substantial continuities. Identify three features of European life in 1815 that persisted relatively unchanged from 1648 (the persistence of monarchy after the Bourbon Restoration; serfdom in Russia and central Europe; the Catholic Church's institutional presence; patriarchal civil law; Atlantic slave-labor system in colonial holdings).
  4. (Continuity and Change, Skill 5.A) Compare the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man, the 1804 Civil Code, and the 1815 Holy Alliance. What does each source claim about the basis of legitimate political authority, and how does the trajectory from one to the next illustrate Unit 5's continuity-and-change pattern?
  5. (Continuity and Change) Connect Unit 5's late-eighteenth-century crisis to Unit 4's Enlightenment background and to Unit 6's nineteenth-century industrial transformation. How did the Enlightenment intellectual conditions produce the late-eighteenth-century crisis, and how did the post-Vienna settlement set the stage for nineteenth-century developments?

Classroom Activities

25 min

Unit 5 Continuity-and-Change Matrix

On the board, draw a two-column matrix: “Substantial Changes” and “Substantial Continuities.” In small groups, students fill in five rows for each: change column (Bourbon collapse; abolition of feudal privilege; Napoleonic Civil Code; British maritime primacy; rise of nationalism); continuity column (Bourbon Restoration after 1814; persistence of monarchy elsewhere; Russian and central European serfdom; Catholic Church's institutional presence; patriarchal civil law). Skill 5.A practice: groups draft a thesis statement organizing the matrix.

20 min

Three Documents Trajectory Workshop

Distribute the 1789 Declaration, 1804 Civil Code, and 1815 Holy Alliance excerpts. In small groups, students apply Skill 5.A by tracing the trajectory across the three: revolutionary natural-rights doctrine (1789); partial codification with patriarchal limits (1804); conservative-religious restoration (1815). Groups draft two-paragraph arguments about how the three documents together illustrate Unit 5's continuity-and-change pattern.

15 min

Five-Theme Inventory

On the board, write Unit 5's five themes: SOP (states), ECD (economy), CID (culture), NEI (national identity), SCD (social organization). In pairs, students fill in two specific Unit 5 developments under each theme (e.g., SOP: French Revolution overthrows Bourbon monarchy, Napoleon establishes empire; ECD: Anglo-French rivalry produces British maritime primacy; CID: Romanticism challenges Enlightenment rationality; NEI: nationalism rises in Spain, German states, Russia; SCD: Civil Code restricts women's rights, abolition of feudal privilege). Activity makes Unit 5's multi-thematic span visible.

20 min

Connections to Units 4 and 6 Workshop

On the board, draw three columns: Unit 4 (Enlightenment background), Unit 5 (late-eighteenth-century crisis), Unit 6 (nineteenth-century industrialization). In small groups, students identify three specific connections from Unit 4 to Unit 5 (Locke's natural rights to 1789 Declaration; Rousseau's emphasis on emotion to Romanticism; Smith's free-trade economics to British commercial primacy) and three specific connections from Unit 5 to Unit 6 (post-Vienna conservative order setting the stage for 1848 revolutions; Civil Code spreading legal modernization; British maritime primacy supporting nineteenth-century industrial expansion). Skill 5.A practice: students identify cross-unit patterns.

Vocabulary

The 1789-1799 political upheaval in France that overthrew the Bourbon monarchy, abolished feudal privileges, instituted (briefly) a republic, and instituted (during the radical Jacobin phase) the Reign of Terror. Mounted a fundamental challenge to Europe's political and social order.
Corsican-born French general (1769-1821) and political leader. Ruled as first consul (1799-1804) and emperor (1804-1814 and the Hundred Days of 1815). Reshaped European politics through military conquest and legal codification (Civil Code, lycées, prefects, Concordat).
The 1804 French civil law code promulgated under Napoleon. Codified revolutionary principles of equality before the law, property rights, contract law, and legal uniformity for adult men, while sharply restricting women's rights. Spread across Napoleonic Europe; remains in force in many European jurisdictions today.
The 1814-1815 European diplomatic conference that ended the Napoleonic Wars and reorganized European borders along principles of legitimacy, compensation, and balance of power. Produced the post-Vienna Concert of Europe; settlement held until the 1848 revolutions.
The post-1815 system of conservative diplomatic coordination among Britain, Austria, Prussia, Russia, and France (from 1818) to contain revolutionary politics. Held until the 1848 revolutions broke the consensus.
Austrian diplomat and statesman (1773-1859), Habsburg foreign minister from 1809 and chancellor from 1821. Principal architect of the Vienna settlement and of the post-Vienna Concert of Europe. The Metternich system dominated European politics until 1848.
The late-eighteenth- and early-nineteenth-century European intellectual and artistic movement that challenged Enlightenment rationality with renewed emphasis on emotion, nature, individual subjective experience, and historical-cultural particularity.
The 1791-1804 revolt of enslaved Africans in the French colony of Saint-Domingue against French rule. Inspired by the French Revolution's principles of liberty and equality. Produced the independent nation of Haiti (1 January 1804) — the only successful slave revolt in modern history to produce an independent state.
The modern political doctrine that the people of a particular national community (defined by language, culture, history, or politics) constitute the proper unit of political sovereignty. Emerged from the French Revolution (the “nation” replacing the king as locus of sovereignty) and from Napoleonic-era resistance movements.
The political tradition emphasizing natural rights, constitutional government, individual liberty, and free markets. Drew on the 1789 Declaration of Rights and the moderate phase of the French Revolution. Principal nineteenth-century European political tradition alongside conservatism.
The political tradition emphasizing inherited institutions, gradual reform, organic society, and skepticism about abstract revolutionary principle. Emerged from Burke's Reflections (1790) and de Maistre's Considerations on France (1796). Institutionalized in the post-Vienna Concert of Europe.
The political and social system of pre-Revolutionary France: Bourbon monarchy, three estates (clergy, nobility, commoners), seigneurial obligations, tax exemptions for the privileged orders. Ended by the French Revolution; the term itself was coined by revolutionaries to mark the contrast.
The eighteenth- and nineteenth-century European diplomatic principle that no single state should be allowed to dominate the continent. Continued from the 1648 Westphalia and 1713 Utrecht settlements through the 1815 Vienna settlement and the post-Vienna Concert of Europe.
The AP European History reasoning process that asks students to describe what changed and what persisted across a historical period and to account for the causes of both. Topic 5.9 deploys it to organize the Unit 5 synthesis.
The historiographical periodization (Eric Hobsbawm) running from the 1789 French Revolution to the 1914 outbreak of the First World War. Frames the post-Vienna nineteenth-century European order that Units 5, 6, and 7 trace; its “long” character runs from the late-eighteenth-century crisis through industrialization and the rise of mass politics.

Standards Alignment

Draft alignment — pending educator review. AP European History codes correspond to the official College Board Course and Exam Description (Effective Fall 2023, V.1). Statements below are paraphrased in the CountryReports voice; refer to the College Board's published CED for verbatim wording.

AP European History CED-ALIGNED

Thematic Focus (Synthesis)

SOPStates and Other Institutions of Power — the central political arc of Unit 5: French Revolution, Napoleonic empire, Vienna restoration.
ECDEconomic and Commercial Developments — the eighteenth-century Anglo-French commercial rivalry and the rise of British global maritime primacy.
CIDCultural and Intellectual Developments — the Romantic Movement and religious revival as challenges to Enlightenment rationality.
NEINational and European Identity — the rise of nationalism in response to Napoleonic empire-building, especially in Spain, the German states, and Russia.
SCDSocial Organization and Development — the Revolution's effects on European political and social ideas, including the Haitian Revolution and women's revolutionary participation.

Historical Thinking Skill and Reasoning Process

Skill 5.AIdentify patterns among or connections between historical developments and processes. (Skill category 5: Making Connections.)
Reasoning 3Continuity and Change — describe historical continuities and changes over time and explain their causes and effects.

Learning Objective

LO 5.JAccount for how the developments and challenges to the political order produced change between 1648 and 1815.

Key Concepts (Review)

KC-2.1Different models of political sovereignty shaped the relationship among states and between states and individuals.
KC-2.1.IVThe French Revolution mounted a fundamental challenge to Europe's existing political and social order.
KC-2.1.VClaiming to defend the ideals of the French Revolution, Napoleon Bonaparte imposed French rule over much of Europe, eventually provoking a nationalist reaction.
KC-2.2The expansion of European commerce accelerated the growth of a worldwide economic network.
KC-2.2.IIICommercial rivalries shaped diplomacy and warfare among early modern European states.
KC-2.3The spread of Scientific Revolution concepts and the Enlightenment's application of them raised reason's place in European culture, though not without resistance.
KC-2.3.VIAlthough Enlightenment values dominated European ideas and culture, they were challenged by the public revival of emotion and feeling.
KC-2.3.VI.DRevolution, war, and rebellion revealed the emotional power of mass politics and nationalism.
National Cross-Walks
NCSS Theme 2Time, Continuity, and Change — the late-eighteenth-century European political and intellectual crisis as the engine of subsequent nineteenth-century European developments.
NCSS Theme 6Power, Authority, and Governance — the trajectory from Bourbon ancien régime through revolutionary republic and Napoleonic empire to post-Vienna conservative order.
C3 D2.His.16.9-12Integrate evidence from multiple relevant historical sources and interpretations into a reasoned argument about the past.
C3 D2.His.14.9-12Analyze multiple and complex causes and effects of events in the past.
CCSS WHST.11-12.1Write arguments focused on discipline-specific content; introduce precise, knowledgeable claims and distinguish them from alternate or opposing claims.
Discipline-Specific National Standards
NSH Era 7 · Std 9Examine the late-eighteenth- and early-nineteenth-century European political and intellectual crisis as a single connected period of substantial transformation alongside substantial continuity.
NSH Era 7 · Std 9AExamine the connections among Unit 5's developments: Anglo-French rivalry producing the conditions for revolution; the French Revolution producing the Haitian Revolution and the Napoleonic empire; the Napoleonic empire producing nationalist responses and the Vienna settlement; Romanticism producing a parallel intellectual challenge to Enlightenment rationality.
Other Assessment Frameworks
AP US HistoryCross-reference Period 3 (1754-1800) and Period 4 (1800-1848) — the late-eighteenth-century European context for the early American Republic; the Napoleonic Wars' effect on the U.S. (Embargo Act, War of 1812, Louisiana Purchase); the post-Vienna Monroe Doctrine (1823).
AP World HistoryCross-reference Unit 5 (Revolutions) — the French and Haitian Revolutions in comparative perspective with the American (1776) and Latin American independence movements (1810s-1820s) as the principal late-eighteenth- and early-nineteenth-century Atlantic revolutionary movements.
AP Comparative GovernmentCross-reference foundational concepts — revolutionary versus constitutional regime change; the relationship between political ideology and political violence; nationalism as a modern political force.

AP Practice Questions

Multiple Choice Sample ~ 2 min
1Question: Which of the following best characterizes the European political and intellectual order in 1815 compared to 1648?
  • (A) Europe in 1815 was identical to Europe in 1648, with no significant change in political institutions, intellectual frameworks, or international relations.
  • (B) Europe in 1815 had been completely transformed by the French Revolution and Napoleon, with no continuities preserved from the older order.
  • (C) Europe in 1815 combined substantial change (the French Revolution's challenge to the existing order; Napoleonic legal codes; the rise of nationalism; British maritime primacy; Romanticism) with substantial continuity (Bourbon Restoration; persistent monarchies; Russian serfdom; Catholic Church's institutional presence; balance-of-power diplomacy) (KC-2.1, KC-2.1.IV, KC-2.1.V, KC-2.3.VI).
  • (D) Europe in 1815 had returned entirely to the medieval social order of the pre-1648 period.
  • (E) Europe in 1815 had become a fully democratic federation under universal suffrage.

Correct: (C). KC-2.1, KC-2.1.IV, KC-2.1.V, and KC-2.3.VI together capture Unit 5's central continuity-and-change pattern: substantial transformation through the late-eighteenth-century crisis combined with substantial restoration through the Vienna settlement. Choice (A) misstates: significant change occurred. (B) overstates: many older institutions and patterns persisted. (D) reverses the trajectory: 1815 Europe was substantially modernized compared to medieval Europe, even after the conservative Vienna settlement. (E) is anachronistic: democratic federation is a twentieth-century development. (LO J; Skill 5.A; Reasoning Process: Continuity and Change).

Short Answer Question ~ 12 min · 1 page
2Question: Using your knowledge of European history between roughly 1648 and 1815, answer all three parts that follow.
  1. Identify ONE specific substantial change that the late-eighteenth-century European political and intellectual crisis produced.
  2. Explain ONE specific substantial continuity that persisted relatively unchanged across the period.
  3. Explain ONE specific connection between Unit 5's developments and the broader European arc from 1648 to 1815.

Scoring: 1 point for each part. Strong responses to part (a) might cite the Bourbon ancien régime's collapse in 1789 and abolition of feudal privileges; the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man's natural-rights doctrine; the 1791 and 1792 constitutions; the Napoleonic Civil Code (1804) codifying revolutionary principles for adult men; the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire (1806); the rise of nationalism in Spain, the German states, Russia; British global maritime primacy after 1815; the Haitian Revolution producing the only successful slave revolt to produce an independent state; or Romanticism's challenge to Enlightenment rationality (KC-2.1.IV, KC-2.1.V, KC-2.1.III.D, KC-2.3.VI). Part (b) responses might cite the Bourbon Restoration in France, Spain, and the Two Sicilies; the persistence of monarchy in most European states after 1815; Russian serfdom (continuing until 1861); central European serfdom in many territories; the Catholic Church's continued institutional presence even after the Concordat; the post-Vienna Concert of Europe continuing the balance-of-power diplomatic system; patriarchal civil law actually intensified under the Napoleonic Civil Code; the Atlantic slave-labor system continuing in Caribbean colonies, Brazil, and Cuba into the late nineteenth century; the persistence of pre-industrial European economic structures despite British industrialization. Part (c) responses might cite the Anglo-French commercial rivalry of Topics 5.2-5.3 producing both British 1763 victory and French fiscal collapse contributing to the 1789 Revolution; the French Revolution producing the Haitian Revolution and the Napoleonic empire; Napoleonic empire-building producing nationalist responses and the Vienna settlement; or Romanticism connecting Enlightenment rationality (Unit 4) with nineteenth-century cultural nationalism (Unit 7).

Document-Based Question Stem ~ 60 min · 7 documents
3Prompt: Account for how the developments and challenges to the political order produced change between 1648 and 1815. In your response, draw evidence from the seven documents and from your own knowledge of the period.

The full seven-document set for this DBQ lives in the Unit 5 practice exam packet (Document A: Treaty of Paris, 1763; Document B: Declaration of the Rights of Man, 1789; Document C: Toussaint, Saint-Domingue Constitution, 1801; Document D: Napoleonic Civil Code, 1804; Document E: Wordsworth, Preface to Lyrical Ballads, 1800; Document F: Final Act of Vienna, 1815; Document G: Holy Alliance, 1815).

Scoring framework: 1 point thesis, 1 point contextualization, up to 4 points evidence (at least 3 documents used to support the argument, plus an outside-evidence point), 1 point sourcing (point of view, purpose, situation, audience for at least three documents), 1 point complexity. Maximum 7 points. The default reasoning process is Continuity and Change; strong responses identify both the substantial changes (Anglo-French rivalry's outcome; revolutionary natural-rights doctrine; Haitian Revolution; Napoleonic legal codification; Romanticism) and the substantial continuities (Bourbon Restoration; conservative Vienna settlement; persistence of monarchy; Russian serfdom; balance-of-power diplomacy). Acknowledging the asymmetric character of the change-and-continuity pattern (revolutionary changes for adult men under Napoleonic Civil Code coexisting with restricted women's rights; abolition of European feudal privileges coexisting with Atlantic slave-labor system) earns the complexity point.

Long Essay Question Stem ~ 40 min
4Prompt: Account for how the developments and challenges to the European political order produced both change and continuity between roughly 1648 and 1815. Defend a clear claim with specific historical evidence.

Scoring framework: 1 point thesis, 1 point contextualization, 2 points evidence (at least two pieces of specific historical evidence, one of which directly supports the argument), 1 point analysis using the Continuity and Change reasoning process, 1 point complexity. Maximum 6 points. The complexity point is most often earned by integrating multiple Unit 5 threads (political, economic, intellectual, social) and acknowledging that the late-eighteenth-century crisis produced both substantial transformation and substantial restoration. Strong responses connect specific Unit 5 developments (the French Revolution's abolition of feudal privilege; Napoleonic legal codification; British maritime primacy; the Haitian Revolution; Romanticism; the Vienna settlement) to a coherent continuity-and-change argument backed by specific evidence.