Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
- Account for how the developments and challenges to the political order produced change between 1648 and 1815 (LO J; Skill 5.A; KC-2.1).
- Identify the principal substantial changes the late-eighteenth-century revolutionary crisis produced (KC-2.1.IV French Revolution, KC-2.1.V Napoleon, KC-2.1.III.D British rise) and the principal substantial continuities (Bourbon Restoration, persistence of monarchy, Russian serfdom).
- Account for the connections among the political (KC-2.1.IV-V), economic (KC-2.2.III), intellectual (KC-2.3.VI), and cultural threads of Unit 5.
- Use Skill 5.A (Making Connections) to identify patterns connecting Unit 5's diverse developments into a coherent continuity-and-change argument.
- Connect Unit 5's late-eighteenth-century crisis to Unit 4's Enlightenment background and to Unit 6's nineteenth-century industrial transformation.
Key Concepts
Topic 5.9 closes Unit 5 by asking students to construct a continuity-and-change argument across the unit's principal threads. The unit covered the late-eighteenth-century European political and intellectual crisis. KC-2.1 captures the broad framing: different models of political sovereignty shaped the relationship among states and between states and individuals. Across 1648-1815, those models came under sustained challenge: the French Revolution mounted a fundamental challenge to Bourbon ancien-régime political and social order; Napoleon's empire spread revolutionary legal codes across Europe; Britain rose to global maritime and commercial primacy; Romanticism and religious revival challenged Enlightenment rationality; the Vienna settlement attempted to restore the older dynastic system while accommodating substantial revolutionary transformation.
The substantial changes ran along multiple axes. Politically: the Bourbon ancien régime collapsed in 1789 (KC-2.1.IV.A); feudal privileges and seigneurial obligations were legally abolished in France on 4 August 1789 and across Napoleonic Europe (KC-2.1.IV.B); the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man articulated natural-rights doctrine that overturned divine-right absolutism; the 1791 and 1793 Constitutions established (briefly) constitutional monarchy and (then) republic; the radical Jacobin Republic and Reign of Terror (KC-2.1.IV.C) produced the first modern citizen-army through the August 1793 levée en masse (KC-2.1.IV.D); Napoleon's 1804 Civil Code (KC-2.1.V.A) codified revolutionary legal principles for adult men across Napoleonic Europe; the Holy Roman Empire dissolved in 1806 and was replaced by the German Confederation in 1815. Economically and commercially: the Anglo-French rivalry ended with British global maritime primacy (KC-2.1.III.D); the Atlantic slave-labor system began to be challenged by abolitionism (the British 1807 abolition of the slave trade; the Haitian Revolution producing the only successful slave revolt in modern history, KC-2.1.IV.F).
Continuing the inventory of substantial changes: religiously, the 1790 Civil Constitution of the Clergy nationalized the French Catholic Church; the 1801 Concordat reconciled state and Roman Catholic Church on new terms; the 1781 Edict of Toleration in Habsburg Austria and the French 1787 Edict of Versailles extended religious toleration; the Methodist religious revival under John Wesley produced a new working-class Protestant movement (KC-2.3.VI.C). Nationally: nationalism emerged as a new political force in Spain (Peninsular War), the German states (Fichte's Addresses; Prussian reforms), Russia (1812 patriotic resistance), and (later) Italy and Greece (KC-2.1.V.C); the basic vocabulary of modern political ideology (liberalism, conservatism, socialism, republicanism) emerged from the French Revolution and the debate over its meaning (KC-2.1.IV.G). Culturally: Romanticism challenged Enlightenment rationality in literature, music, religion, and political thought (KC-2.3.VI); the modern autobiographical tradition (Rousseau's Confessions); the modern historical novel (Walter Scott); and the modern cultural-nationalist movement (Fichte, the Romantic poets) all emerged in this period.
The substantial continuities ran alongside these changes. Most European monarchies were restored after 1814-1815: the Bourbons in France (Louis XVIII, then Charles X, then the July Monarchy of 1830), Spain (Ferdinand VII), and the Two Sicilies; the House of Savoy in Sardinia-Piedmont; the Italian dynasties; the Habsburg, Hohenzollern, and Romanov dynasties continued their rule. The 1815 Vienna settlement (KC-2.1.V.D) explicitly invoked legitimacy as a settlement principle. Serfdom persisted in Russia until 1861 and in many eastern and central European territories well into the nineteenth century. Even where Napoleon had abolished serfdom in his satellite kingdoms (the 1807 Prussian reforms; the Habsburg Joseph II's 1781 Patent), the underlying landlord-peasant relations often continued in modified form. The Atlantic slave-labor system continued in the British and French Caribbean (until 1833 and 1848 respectively) and in Brazil and Cuba into the late nineteenth century. Most European peasants in 1815 still farmed under traditional obligations modified but not eliminated.
Other substantial continuities: the Catholic Church remained a major political and cultural force even after the Concordat; the post-1815 Catholic revival (Chateaubriand, the papal politics of Gregory XVI and Pius IX) reasserted Catholic authority across Catholic Europe. The European balance-of-power diplomatic system, ratified at Westphalia in 1648 and refined at Utrecht in 1713 (Topic 3.6), continued to organize post-Vienna international politics through the Concert of Europe (Topic 5.7). Patriarchal authority over women in the legal-civil sphere actually intensified under the Napoleonic Civil Code (Topic 5.6); Wollstonecraft's and de Gouges's revolutionary-era arguments for women's political equality (Topics 4.3 and 5.4) did not produce institutional change in the Napoleonic period or under the post-Vienna restored monarchies. Atlantic and European commercial structures continued: most overseas trade still moved through pre-industrial sail-and-cart infrastructure; the British Industrial Revolution had begun in late-eighteenth-century Lancashire but had not yet transformed the broader European economy.
The connections among Unit 5's developments — what Skill 5.A asks students to identify — run in several specific directions. The Anglo-French rivalry (Topics 5.2-5.3) produced both the British 1763 victory and the French fiscal collapse that contributed to the 1789 Revolution (Topic 5.4). The French Revolution (Topic 5.4) produced both the Haitian Revolution (Topic 5.5) and the Napoleonic empire (Topic 5.6). Napoleonic empire-building (Topic 5.6) produced the nationalist responses (Topic 5.6) and the Vienna settlement (Topic 5.7) responding to its collapse. Romanticism (Topic 5.8) was both a response to Enlightenment rationality (Unit 4) and a parallel cultural development to the political crisis. The Vienna settlement (Topic 5.7) explicitly attempted to contain the revolutionary and nationalist forces the Revolution and Napoleon had unleashed; its partial success and partial failure shaped post-1815 European politics through 1848.
Topic 5.9's central message is that the late-eighteenth-century European political and intellectual crisis produced both substantial transformation and substantial continuity. The post-Vienna European order of 1815 differed substantially from the European order of 1648 in legal codes, political institutions, intellectual frameworks, and international relations; it also retained substantial continuities in monarchy, ecclesiastical authority, social hierarchy, and gendered legal status. Unit 6's nineteenth-century industrialization and Unit 7's nineteenth-century political developments will trace how the post-Vienna settlement gradually broke down across the nineteenth century, producing the modern European order through the 1848 revolutions, the unification movements, and the rise of mass politics.
Primary Source Excerpts
Three sources framing Unit 5's continuity-and-change argument: the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man, Napoleon's 1804 Civil Code, and the 1815 Holy Alliance. Read together, the three documents trace the unit's arc from revolution through Napoleonic codification to conservative restoration.
Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, 26 August 1789
The August 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen articulated the foundational revolutionary principles: natural equality of all men, protection of natural rights as the purpose of political association, and the location of sovereignty in the nation rather than in a hereditary monarch. The Declaration was incorporated into the 1791 Constitution as a preamble and remains foundational to modern French constitutional law. For Topic 5.9 the source represents the moment of revolutionary challenge to the existing political and social order — the substantial change that Unit 5 traces. Read alongside the Civil Code and the Holy Alliance, it lets students see how revolutionary principles were partially codified by Napoleon and partially restored against by the post-Vienna settlement.
Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, 26 August 1789, in Archives Parlementaires, vol. 8 (Paris: P. Dupont, 1875). Internet History Sourcebooks (Fordham University). View at Internet History Sourcebooks →The Napoleonic Civil Code, Title Preliminary, 1804
The 1804 Civil Code (Code Napoleon) codified French civil law along revolutionary lines: legal uniformity across the French territory; equality before the law for all French citizens (Article 8); civil rights independent of birth or estate (Article 7). The same Code, however, sharply restricted married women's legal rights (Article 213). The combination — egalitarian among adult men, patriarchal toward women — was the canonical Napoleonic pattern. The Code spread across Napoleonic Europe and remained in force in Belgium, Luxembourg, parts of Germany and Italy, Louisiana, and elsewhere into the present. For Topic 5.9 the source illustrates the partial codification of revolutionary principles that survived Napoleon's defeat. Read alongside the 1789 Declaration and the 1815 Holy Alliance, it reveals the partial change-and-continuity character of the Unit 5 trajectory.
French Civil Code (1804), in The Code Napoléon, trans. George Spence (London: William Benning, 1827). Internet History Sourcebooks (Fordham University). View at Internet History Sourcebooks →The Holy Alliance, 26 September 1815
The September 1815 Holy Alliance, signed by the Russian, Austrian, and Prussian sovereigns, framed the post-Vienna conservative international order in mystical Christian terms. Tsar Alexander I drafted the treaty; the other monarchs accepted it reluctantly. Most other European monarchies eventually joined; principal exceptions were Britain, the Papal States, and the Ottoman Sultan. British Foreign Secretary Castlereagh dismissed it as “sublime mysticism and nonsense.” The Holy Alliance had limited practical effect but symbolized the post-Vienna conservative monarchical solidarity that the Concert of Europe institutionalized. For Topic 5.9 the source represents the conservative attempt to restore the older European order against revolutionary and Napoleonic transformation. Read alongside the 1789 Declaration and the 1804 Civil Code, it reveals the partial-restoration character of the Vienna settlement: conservative dynasties restored, but unable to undo many of the revolutionary and Napoleonic changes.
The Holy Alliance, 26 September 1815, in British and Foreign State Papers, vol. 2 (London: HMSO, 1838). Internet History Sourcebooks (Fordham University). View at Internet History Sourcebooks →Discussion Questions
- (Continuity and Change, Skill 5.A) Construct an argument: how did the developments and challenges to the political order produce change between 1648 and 1815, and what persisted? What specific evidence drawn from across Unit 5 best supports your continuity-and-change thesis?
- (Continuity and Change) Account for the principal substantial changes Unit 5 traces (KC-2.1.IV French Revolution, KC-2.1.V Napoleon, KC-2.1.III.D British rise, KC-2.3.VI Romanticism). Identify three changes that lasted into the post-1815 European order.
- (Continuity and Change) Account for the principal substantial continuities. Identify three features of European life in 1815 that persisted relatively unchanged from 1648 (the persistence of monarchy after the Bourbon Restoration; serfdom in Russia and central Europe; the Catholic Church's institutional presence; patriarchal civil law; Atlantic slave-labor system in colonial holdings).
- (Continuity and Change, Skill 5.A) Compare the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man, the 1804 Civil Code, and the 1815 Holy Alliance. What does each source claim about the basis of legitimate political authority, and how does the trajectory from one to the next illustrate Unit 5's continuity-and-change pattern?
- (Continuity and Change) Connect Unit 5's late-eighteenth-century crisis to Unit 4's Enlightenment background and to Unit 6's nineteenth-century industrial transformation. How did the Enlightenment intellectual conditions produce the late-eighteenth-century crisis, and how did the post-Vienna settlement set the stage for nineteenth-century developments?
Classroom Activities
Unit 5 Continuity-and-Change Matrix
On the board, draw a two-column matrix: “Substantial Changes” and “Substantial Continuities.” In small groups, students fill in five rows for each: change column (Bourbon collapse; abolition of feudal privilege; Napoleonic Civil Code; British maritime primacy; rise of nationalism); continuity column (Bourbon Restoration after 1814; persistence of monarchy elsewhere; Russian and central European serfdom; Catholic Church's institutional presence; patriarchal civil law). Skill 5.A practice: groups draft a thesis statement organizing the matrix.
Three Documents Trajectory Workshop
Distribute the 1789 Declaration, 1804 Civil Code, and 1815 Holy Alliance excerpts. In small groups, students apply Skill 5.A by tracing the trajectory across the three: revolutionary natural-rights doctrine (1789); partial codification with patriarchal limits (1804); conservative-religious restoration (1815). Groups draft two-paragraph arguments about how the three documents together illustrate Unit 5's continuity-and-change pattern.
Five-Theme Inventory
On the board, write Unit 5's five themes: SOP (states), ECD (economy), CID (culture), NEI (national identity), SCD (social organization). In pairs, students fill in two specific Unit 5 developments under each theme (e.g., SOP: French Revolution overthrows Bourbon monarchy, Napoleon establishes empire; ECD: Anglo-French rivalry produces British maritime primacy; CID: Romanticism challenges Enlightenment rationality; NEI: nationalism rises in Spain, German states, Russia; SCD: Civil Code restricts women's rights, abolition of feudal privilege). Activity makes Unit 5's multi-thematic span visible.
Connections to Units 4 and 6 Workshop
On the board, draw three columns: Unit 4 (Enlightenment background), Unit 5 (late-eighteenth-century crisis), Unit 6 (nineteenth-century industrialization). In small groups, students identify three specific connections from Unit 4 to Unit 5 (Locke's natural rights to 1789 Declaration; Rousseau's emphasis on emotion to Romanticism; Smith's free-trade economics to British commercial primacy) and three specific connections from Unit 5 to Unit 6 (post-Vienna conservative order setting the stage for 1848 revolutions; Civil Code spreading legal modernization; British maritime primacy supporting nineteenth-century industrial expansion). Skill 5.A practice: students identify cross-unit patterns.
Vocabulary
Standards Alignment
Draft alignment — pending educator review. AP European History codes correspond to the official College Board Course and Exam Description (Effective Fall 2023, V.1). Statements below are paraphrased in the CountryReports voice; refer to the College Board's published CED for verbatim wording.
Thematic Focus (Synthesis)
Historical Thinking Skill and Reasoning Process
Learning Objective
Key Concepts (Review)
AP Practice Questions
- (A) Europe in 1815 was identical to Europe in 1648, with no significant change in political institutions, intellectual frameworks, or international relations.
- (B) Europe in 1815 had been completely transformed by the French Revolution and Napoleon, with no continuities preserved from the older order.
- (C) Europe in 1815 combined substantial change (the French Revolution's challenge to the existing order; Napoleonic legal codes; the rise of nationalism; British maritime primacy; Romanticism) with substantial continuity (Bourbon Restoration; persistent monarchies; Russian serfdom; Catholic Church's institutional presence; balance-of-power diplomacy) (KC-2.1, KC-2.1.IV, KC-2.1.V, KC-2.3.VI).
- (D) Europe in 1815 had returned entirely to the medieval social order of the pre-1648 period.
- (E) Europe in 1815 had become a fully democratic federation under universal suffrage.
Correct: (C). KC-2.1, KC-2.1.IV, KC-2.1.V, and KC-2.3.VI together capture Unit 5's central continuity-and-change pattern: substantial transformation through the late-eighteenth-century crisis combined with substantial restoration through the Vienna settlement. Choice (A) misstates: significant change occurred. (B) overstates: many older institutions and patterns persisted. (D) reverses the trajectory: 1815 Europe was substantially modernized compared to medieval Europe, even after the conservative Vienna settlement. (E) is anachronistic: democratic federation is a twentieth-century development. (LO J; Skill 5.A; Reasoning Process: Continuity and Change).
- Identify ONE specific substantial change that the late-eighteenth-century European political and intellectual crisis produced.
- Explain ONE specific substantial continuity that persisted relatively unchanged across the period.
- Explain ONE specific connection between Unit 5's developments and the broader European arc from 1648 to 1815.
Scoring: 1 point for each part. Strong responses to part (a) might cite the Bourbon ancien régime's collapse in 1789 and abolition of feudal privileges; the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man's natural-rights doctrine; the 1791 and 1792 constitutions; the Napoleonic Civil Code (1804) codifying revolutionary principles for adult men; the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire (1806); the rise of nationalism in Spain, the German states, Russia; British global maritime primacy after 1815; the Haitian Revolution producing the only successful slave revolt to produce an independent state; or Romanticism's challenge to Enlightenment rationality (KC-2.1.IV, KC-2.1.V, KC-2.1.III.D, KC-2.3.VI). Part (b) responses might cite the Bourbon Restoration in France, Spain, and the Two Sicilies; the persistence of monarchy in most European states after 1815; Russian serfdom (continuing until 1861); central European serfdom in many territories; the Catholic Church's continued institutional presence even after the Concordat; the post-Vienna Concert of Europe continuing the balance-of-power diplomatic system; patriarchal civil law actually intensified under the Napoleonic Civil Code; the Atlantic slave-labor system continuing in Caribbean colonies, Brazil, and Cuba into the late nineteenth century; the persistence of pre-industrial European economic structures despite British industrialization. Part (c) responses might cite the Anglo-French commercial rivalry of Topics 5.2-5.3 producing both British 1763 victory and French fiscal collapse contributing to the 1789 Revolution; the French Revolution producing the Haitian Revolution and the Napoleonic empire; Napoleonic empire-building producing nationalist responses and the Vienna settlement; or Romanticism connecting Enlightenment rationality (Unit 4) with nineteenth-century cultural nationalism (Unit 7).
The full seven-document set for this DBQ lives in the Unit 5 practice exam packet (Document A: Treaty of Paris, 1763; Document B: Declaration of the Rights of Man, 1789; Document C: Toussaint, Saint-Domingue Constitution, 1801; Document D: Napoleonic Civil Code, 1804; Document E: Wordsworth, Preface to Lyrical Ballads, 1800; Document F: Final Act of Vienna, 1815; Document G: Holy Alliance, 1815).
Scoring framework: 1 point thesis, 1 point contextualization, up to 4 points evidence (at least 3 documents used to support the argument, plus an outside-evidence point), 1 point sourcing (point of view, purpose, situation, audience for at least three documents), 1 point complexity. Maximum 7 points. The default reasoning process is Continuity and Change; strong responses identify both the substantial changes (Anglo-French rivalry's outcome; revolutionary natural-rights doctrine; Haitian Revolution; Napoleonic legal codification; Romanticism) and the substantial continuities (Bourbon Restoration; conservative Vienna settlement; persistence of monarchy; Russian serfdom; balance-of-power diplomacy). Acknowledging the asymmetric character of the change-and-continuity pattern (revolutionary changes for adult men under Napoleonic Civil Code coexisting with restricted women's rights; abolition of European feudal privileges coexisting with Atlantic slave-labor system) earns the complexity point.
Scoring framework: 1 point thesis, 1 point contextualization, 2 points evidence (at least two pieces of specific historical evidence, one of which directly supports the argument), 1 point analysis using the Continuity and Change reasoning process, 1 point complexity. Maximum 6 points. The complexity point is most often earned by integrating multiple Unit 5 threads (political, economic, intellectual, social) and acknowledging that the late-eighteenth-century crisis produced both substantial transformation and substantial restoration. Strong responses connect specific Unit 5 developments (the French Revolution's abolition of feudal privilege; Napoleonic legal codification; British maritime primacy; the Haitian Revolution; Romanticism; the Vienna settlement) to a coherent continuity-and-change argument backed by specific evidence.

English
Español
中文
हिन्दी
Français