Learning Objectives
By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:
- Describe the broader context shaping how nationalist and imperialist sentiments developed across Europe between 1815 and 1914 (Skill 4.B; LO A).
- Account for KC-3.4: how European states struggled to maintain international stability in an age of nationalism and revolutions.
- Account for KC-3.5: how a variety of motives and methods drove the intensification of European global control and produced rising tensions among the great powers.
- Account for KC-3.6: how European ideas and culture expressed an ongoing tension between objectivity and scientific realism on one hand and subjectivity and individual expression on the other.
- Identify how Continuity and Change applies across the unit — the substantial transformation of the European political map and intellectual landscape alongside the persistence of dynastic monarchies and traditional cultural patterns.
Key Concepts
Unit 7 covers the principal political and intellectual developments of nineteenth-century Europe between roughly 1815 and 1914. The unit's three principal threads are political (the rise of nationalism, the unification of Italy and Germany, the late-century alliance system), imperial (the new imperialism in Africa and Asia and its effects), and intellectual (the post-1848 turn to realism and materialism, the late-century turn to relativism and modernism). Topic 7.1 introduces the three thread structure that organizes the unit and connects each thread to its specific Unit 7 topics.
The political thread. The first cluster is KC-3.4: European states struggled to maintain international stability in an age of nationalism and revolutions. Topics 7.2 and 7.3 cover this cluster in detail. KC-3.4.II: the breakdown of the Concert of Europe (covered in Topic 6.6) opened the way for movements of national unification in Italy and Germany and for liberal reforms elsewhere. The 1848 revolutions had ended the Concert system. The Crimean War (1853-1856) further weakened the Ottoman Empire and the conservative diplomatic order. Italian unification (1859-1870) under Cavour's Realpolitik diplomacy and Garibaldi's popular military campaigns produced a unified Italian state. KC-3.4.III.B: Bismarck used Realpolitik — diplomacy, industrialized warfare, modern weaponry, and the manipulation of democratic mechanisms — to unify Germany through the wars against Denmark (1864), Austria (1866), and France (1870-1871).
KC-3.4.III: the unification of Italy and Germany reshaped the European balance of power and produced efforts to construct a new diplomatic order. KC-3.4.III.C: after 1871, Bismarck attempted to maintain the European balance of power through a complex alliance system aimed at isolating France. The Three Emperors' League (1873, renewed 1881), the Dual Alliance with Austria-Hungary (1879), the Triple Alliance with Austria-Hungary and Italy (1882), and the Reinsurance Treaty with Russia (1887) together constituted the Bismarckian system. KC-3.4.III.D: Bismarck's dismissal in 1890 by the new Kaiser Wilhelm II eventually produced a system of mutually antagonistic alliances and rising international tensions: the Franco-Russian Alliance (1894), the Anglo-French Entente Cordiale (1904), and the Anglo-Russian Entente (1907) faced the Triple Alliance. KC-3.4.III.E: nationalist tensions in the Balkans — the Bosnian crisis of 1908, the Balkan Wars of 1912-1913, and the July 1914 crisis triggered by the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand — drew the great powers into the First World War.
Topic 7.2 also covers the broader development of nationalism. KC-3.3.I.F: nationalists encouraged loyalty to the nation through romantic idealism (Mazzini's Young Italy, the Grimm Brothers' German fairy-tale collection), liberal reform (the British, French, and Belgian liberal-nationalist tradition), political unification (the Italian and German cases), and racialist appeals tied to anti-Semitism (the Dreyfus Affair in France 1894-1906; the Christian Social Party in Germany; Karl Lueger's mayoralty in Vienna). KC-3.3.I.G: although western European Jews became more socially and politically integrated across the nineteenth century, Zionism — a form of Jewish nationalism, founded by Theodor Herzl with Der Judenstaat in 1896 and the First Zionist Congress in 1897 — emerged late in the century in response to growing anti-Semitism across Europe. KC-3.4.II.B: a new generation of conservative leaders (Napoleon III in France; Cavour in Piedmont-Sardinia; Bismarck in Prussia) used popular nationalism to create or strengthen the state. KC-3.4.II.C: the creation of the dual monarchy of Austria-Hungary in 1867 (the Ausgleich), which recognized the political weight of the Hungarian Magyar nobility, attempted to stabilize the Habsburg state by reconfiguring the basis of national unity.
The imperial thread. The second cluster is KC-3.5: a variety of motives and methods drove the intensification of European global control and produced rising tensions among the great powers. Topics 7.6 and 7.7 cover this cluster in detail. KC-3.5.I: European nations pursued new imperial ventures in Asia and Africa from a mix of economic, political, and cultural motivations. KC-3.5.I.A: European national rivalries and strategic concerns fueled imperial expansion and competition for colonies. KC-3.5.I.B: the search for raw materials and markets for manufactured goods, alongside strategic and nationalistic considerations, drove European colonization of Africa and Asia. KC-3.5.I.C: European imperialists justified overseas expansion and rule by claiming cultural and racial superiority — the "white man's burden" (Rudyard Kipling, 1899), the French mission civilisatrice, and Social Darwinism.
The new imperialism was made possible by second-wave technology. KC-3.5.II: industrial and technological developments, including the second industrial revolution, enabled European control of global empires. KC-3.5.II.A: advanced weaponry (the breech-loading rifle, the Maxim machine gun from 1884) ensured the military advantage of Europeans over the regions they colonized. KC-3.5.II.B: communication and transportation technologies (steamships, the Suez Canal opened 1869, the telegraph, the European-controlled railway networks in colonized territories) supported the creation and expansion of European empires. KC-3.5.II.C: advances in medicine — Pasteur's germ theory, anesthesia, antiseptics, and quinine for malaria suppression — enabled European survival in tropical Africa and Asia. By 1900, European powers controlled most of Africa (the principal exception being Ethiopia, which defeated the Italian invasion at Adwa in 1896) and large parts of South and Southeast Asia.
KC-3.5.III: imperial endeavors substantially affected society, diplomacy, and culture in Europe and produced resistance to foreign control abroad. KC-3.5.III.A: imperialism produced diplomatic tensions among European states that strained the alliance systems — the Berlin Conference of 1884-1885 (regulating European partition of Africa), the Fashoda Incident of 1898 (Anglo-French confrontation in the Sudan), and the Moroccan Crises of 1905 and 1911 (Franco-German confrontation). KC-3.5.III.B: imperial encounters shaped the styles and subjects of European artists and writers and provoked debate over the acquisition of colonies (J. A. Hobson's Imperialism: A Study, 1902; Vladimir Lenin's Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism, 1917). KC-3.5.III.C: as non-Europeans became educated in Western values, they challenged European imperialism through nationalist movements (the Indian National Congress, founded 1885; the Chinese Boxer Rebellion of 1899-1901; the Egyptian nationalist movement) and through the modernization of local economies and societies (Meiji Japan from 1868 most notably).
The intellectual thread. The third cluster is KC-3.6: European ideas and culture expressed an ongoing tension between objectivity and scientific realism on one hand and subjectivity and individual expression on the other. Topics 7.4, 7.5, and 7.8 cover this cluster. KC-3.6.II: after the revolutions of 1848, Europe turned toward a realist and materialist worldview. KC-3.6.II.A: positivism (Auguste Comte, John Stuart Mill, Emile Durkheim) emphasized rational and scientific analysis of nature and human affairs as the only reliable form of knowledge. KC-3.6.II.B: Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species (1859) and The Descent of Man (1871) produced a scientific and material account of biological change and human development that became, through the work of Herbert Spencer and others, the foundation of Social Darwinism — the racialist application of biological-evolutionary categories to human societies. KC-3.6.II.D: realist and materialist themes shaped art and literature, with painters and writers depicting the lives of ordinary people and drawing attention to social problems (Gustave Courbet, Honore de Balzac, George Eliot, Leo Tolstoy, Thomas Hardy).
Late in the century, a counter-movement developed. KC-3.6.III: a new relativism in values and a loss of confidence in the objectivity of knowledge produced modernism in intellectual and cultural life. KC-3.6.III.A: philosophy moved largely from rational interpretations of nature and human society toward an emphasis on irrationality and impulse (Friedrich Nietzsche, Henri Bergson, Georges Sorel). KC-3.6.III.B: Freudian psychology offered a new account of human nature emphasizing the irrational and the struggle between the conscious and subconscious mind (Sigmund Freud's Interpretation of Dreams, 1900; Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality, 1905). KC-3.6.III.C: developments in the natural sciences — Max Planck's quantum theory (1900) and Albert Einstein's special relativity (1905) and general relativity (1915) — undermined the primacy of Newtonian physics as an objective description of nature. KC-3.6.III.D: modern art (Impressionism, Post-Impressionism, Cubism) moved beyond representational forms toward the subjective, abstract, and expressive (Cezanne, Van Gogh, Picasso, Matisse).
Topic 7.1 thus introduces the framework Unit 7 will fill in. The Unit's central message is that the second half of the nineteenth century produced both substantial change (the unification of Italy and Germany; the new imperialism; the post-1848 turn to realism and modernism) and substantial continuity (the persistence of dynastic monarchies in most European states; the continued centrality of Christianity in popular religious life; the durable influence of Romanticism on national mythologies). Topic 7.9 closes the unit by asking students to construct the causation argument explicitly — how did nationalist and imperialist movements influence European and global stability across the long nineteenth century?
Primary Source Excerpts
Three sources framing Unit 7's three threads: Bismarck on Realpolitik (the political thread), Kipling on the imperial mission (the imperial thread), and Darwin on natural selection (the intellectual thread).
Otto von Bismarck, Speech to the Prussian Budget Commission ("Blood and Iron"), 30 September 1862
Otto von Bismarck (1815-1898) had been appointed Minister-President of Prussia three weeks earlier, on 23 September 1862, by King Wilhelm I to break the deadlock between the Crown and the Prussian Liberal-dominated Landtag over military reform. The Landtag had refused to vote the budget that included the army-expansion funds Wilhelm wanted. Bismarck's "Blood and Iron" speech to the Budget Commission of the Landtag justified his intent to govern without parliamentary approval until the constitutional question could be resolved — eventually, through the wars of unification (Denmark 1864, Austria 1866, France 1870-1871) that would produce a unified Germany. The phrase "iron and blood" captured the Realpolitik approach KC-3.4.III.B describes. For Topic 7.1 the source is the canonical mid-nineteenth-century articulation of the political-realist approach that produced Italian and German unification.
Otto von Bismarck, "Speech to the Budget Commission of the Prussian Chamber of Deputies, 30 September 1862," in Bismarck: Die gesammelten Werke, vol. 10 (Berlin: Otto Stollberg, 1924), pp. 139-140. Trans. Jonathan Steinberg. View at Internet History Sourcebooks →Rudyard Kipling, "The White Man's Burden," 1899
Rudyard Kipling (1865-1936) was a British author born in Bombay, India, and the principal English-language poet of late-nineteenth-century imperial enthusiasm. He published "The White Man's Burden" in McClure's Magazine in February 1899, addressed specifically to the United States in connection with its 1898 acquisition of the Philippines from Spain. The poem captured (and helped to articulate) the racialist-paternalist justification for European and American overseas rule that KC-3.5.I.C names: imperialism as a moral burden of cultural and racial superiority. The poem provoked extensive contemporary criticism (Mark Twain, Henry James, the African American newspaper editor John H. Smyth) as well as endorsement; it remains the canonical statement of the imperial-justification ideology of the period. For Topic 7.1 the source documents the cultural-racial justification of the new imperialism that Topic 7.6 will examine in detail.
Rudyard Kipling, "The White Man's Burden: The United States and the Philippine Islands," McClure's Magazine 12 (February 1899), p. 290. Project Gutenberg edition of Kipling's The Five Nations, 1903. View at Project Gutenberg →Charles Darwin, On the Origin of Species, 1859
Charles Darwin (1809-1882) was an English naturalist whose 1831-1836 voyage on HMS Beagle, particularly the Galapagos Islands stop, produced the observations that would eventually support his theory of evolution by natural selection. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, published 24 November 1859, presented the theory in book form for the first time and sold out its initial print run on the day of publication. The book provoked extensive scientific and theological controversy (the famous 1860 Oxford debate between T. H. Huxley and Bishop Samuel Wilberforce). The Descent of Man (1871) extended the theory to human evolution. Darwin's biological materialism is the principal exemplar of KC-3.6.II.B: a scientific and material account of biological change that — through Herbert Spencer and others — would also become the foundation of late-nineteenth-century Social Darwinist racial theory. For Topic 7.1 the source documents the central scientific transformation of mid-Victorian intellectual life.
Charles Darwin, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection (London: John Murray, 1859), pp. 80-81. Project Gutenberg edition. View at Project Gutenberg →Discussion Questions
- (Continuity and Change, Skill 4.B) Account for the broader context shaping how nationalist and imperialist sentiments developed across Europe between 1815 and 1914. How did the conditions of Unit 6 (industrialization, the breakdown of the Concert of Europe, the new ideologies) translate into the specific Unit 7 transformations?
- (Continuity and Change) Account for KC-3.4: how did European states struggle to maintain international stability in an age of nationalism and revolutions? Identify three specific developments (Italian unification, German unification, the post-1871 alliance system).
- (Continuity and Change) Account for KC-3.5: how did the new imperialism intensify European global control between 1815 and 1914? Identify three specific motives and three specific technologies that enabled the imperial expansion.
- (Continuity and Change) Account for KC-3.6: how did European intellectual and cultural life shift from realism and materialism (after 1848) to relativism and modernism (after 1880)? Cite specific representatives of each movement.
- (Continuity and Change) Compare what changed and what continued by 1914. Identify two substantial changes (the Italian and German unifications; the new imperialism) and two substantial continuities (the persistence of dynastic monarchies; the continued centrality of Christianity in popular religious life).
Classroom Activities
Three-Thread Preview Workshop
On the board, write Unit 7's three principal threads: political (KC-3.4), imperial (KC-3.5), and intellectual (KC-3.6). In small groups, students match each thread to specific Unit 7 topics (7.2 Nationalism, 7.3 Unification → political; 7.6 New Imperialism, 7.7 Imperialism's Effects → imperial; 7.4 Darwinism, 7.5 Progress and Modernity, 7.8 Culture and Arts → intellectual). Skill 4.B practice: students place each thread within the broader Unit 7 trajectory.
European Map 1815 vs 1914
Distribute two blank European political maps, one for 1815 and one for 1914. In pairs, students complete each: 1815 should show fragmented Italy (Piedmont-Sardinia, Lombardy-Venetia under Austria, the Papal States, the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies, etc.), the German Confederation of 39 states, and the Russian and Habsburg empires intact. 1914 should show unified Italy (1870), unified Germany (1871), Austria-Hungary, and a much-reduced Ottoman Empire after the Balkan Wars. The activity makes the political transformation Unit 7 traces visually concrete.
Three Sources Side-by-Side
Distribute the Bismarck (1862), Kipling (1899), and Darwin (1859) excerpts. In pairs, students identify (a) which Unit 7 thread each source represents (Bismarck: political; Kipling: imperial; Darwin: intellectual); (b) the central claim of each; (c) how each source connects to specific Unit 7 topics. Pairs report back to the class on the connections among the three threads — for example, how Darwinian biological materialism contributed both to mid-century positivism and (through Social Darwinism) to imperial-justification ideology.
Imperial Map Workshop
Distribute a blank world map for 1914. In small groups, students label the principal European colonial empires: British (India, parts of southern Africa, much of West Africa, Australia, New Zealand, Canada); French (Indochina, Algeria, much of West and Central Africa); German (Cameroon, Togoland, German East Africa, German Southwest Africa); Belgian (the Congo); Italian (Libya, Eritrea, Somaliland); Portuguese (Angola, Mozambique). Groups identify the principal areas of European competition (the partition of Africa after the 1884-1885 Berlin Conference; British and French East Asian rivalry). KC-3.5.I and KC-3.5.II become geographically concrete.
Vocabulary
Standards Alignment
Draft alignment — pending educator review. AP European History codes correspond to the official College Board Course and Exam Description (Effective Fall 2023, V.1). Statements below are paraphrased in the CountryReports voice; refer to the College Board's published CED for verbatim wording.
Thematic Focus (Synthesis)
Historical Thinking Skill and Reasoning Process
Learning Objective
Key Concepts (Preview)
AP Practice Questions
- (A) The European political map remained unchanged from 1815 to 1914 with no major unifications or alliance shifts.
- (B) The post-1848 European order produced Italian and German unification, the new imperialism in Africa and Asia, and intellectual transformations from realism through Darwinism to late-century Modernism (KC-3.4, KC-3.5, KC-3.6).
- (C) European intellectual life remained dominated by Enlightenment rationalism throughout the nineteenth century with no significant new currents.
- (D) European empires retreated from Africa and Asia between 1870 and 1914 as colonial peoples regained their independence.
- (E) The Concert of Europe successfully prevented all great-power conflict from 1815 through 1914.
Correct: (B). KC-3.4, KC-3.5, and KC-3.6 together capture Unit 7's three threads: political (unifications, alliances), imperial (the new imperialism), and intellectual (realism, Darwinism, Modernism). (A) is contradicted by the documented Italian and German unifications. (C) ignores the documented post-1848 turn to realism and the late-century relativism. (D) inverts the actual pattern: the new imperialism extended European control over most of Africa and much of Asia. (E) is contradicted by the breakdown of the Concert in 1848 and the late-century alliance tensions. (LO A; Skill 4.B; Reasoning Process: Continuity and Change).
- Identify ONE specific political development that reshaped the European balance of power in the second half of the nineteenth century.
- Explain ONE specific motive that drove European participation in the new imperialism between 1870 and 1914.
- Explain ONE specific way that European intellectual or cultural life shifted between roughly 1850 and 1914.
Scoring: 1 point for each part. Strong responses to part (a) might cite the Crimean War of 1853-1856 weakening the Ottoman Empire and the Concert of Europe (KC-3.4.II.A); Italian unification under Cavour and Garibaldi (1859-1870, KC-3.4.III.A); German unification under Bismarck (1864-1871, KC-3.4.III.B); the Bismarckian alliance system (Three Emperors' League 1873, Triple Alliance 1882, Reinsurance Treaty 1887, KC-3.4.III.C); the post-1890 antagonistic alliance system (Franco-Russian 1894, Anglo-French Entente Cordiale 1904, Anglo-Russian Entente 1907, KC-3.4.III.D); or the creation of the dual monarchy of Austria-Hungary in 1867 (KC-3.4.II.C). Part (b) responses might cite economic motives (raw materials, markets for manufactured goods, KC-3.5.I.B); strategic and great-power competition motives (KC-3.5.I.A, including the Berlin Conference of 1884-1885 regulating the partition of Africa); or cultural-racial justifications (the "white man's burden," the French mission civilisatrice, Social Darwinism, KC-3.5.I.C). Part (c) responses might cite the post-1848 turn to realism in art and literature (Courbet, Balzac, Eliot, Tolstoy, KC-3.6.II.D); positivism in philosophy and social science (Comte, Mill, Durkheim, KC-3.6.II.A); Darwinian biological materialism and Social Darwinism (KC-3.6.II.B); the late-century turn to relativism through Nietzschean philosophy (KC-3.6.III.A); Freudian psychology (KC-3.6.III.B); the Einstein-Planck physics revolution (KC-3.6.III.C); or the Modernist movement in art (Impressionism, Post-Impressionism, Cubism, KC-3.6.III.D).
The full seven-document set for this DBQ lives in the Unit 7 practice exam packet (Document A: Mazzini, Duties of Man, 1860; Document B: Bismarck, Blood and Iron Speech, 1862; Document C: Darwin, Origin of Species, 1859; Document D: Kipling, White Man's Burden, 1899; Document E: Berlin Conference General Act, 1885; Document F: Herzl, Der Judenstaat, 1896; Document G: Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil, 1886).
Scoring framework: 1 point thesis, 1 point contextualization, up to 4 points evidence (at least 3 documents used to support the argument, plus an outside-evidence point), 1 point sourcing (point of view, purpose, situation, audience for at least three documents), 1 point complexity. Maximum 7 points. The default reasoning process is Continuity and Change; strong responses identify the post-1848 European transformation, trace the principal axes of change (Italian and German unification, the new imperialism, the post-1848 turn to realism and modernism), and acknowledge the substantial continuities (the persistence of dynastic monarchies, the durable influence of Romanticism on national mythologies). Acknowledging that the late-nineteenth-century European transformation was not strictly progressive — that nationalism and imperialism produced both new political possibilities and new forms of conflict and exclusion (anti-Semitism, Social Darwinism, Balkan nationalist tensions) — earns the complexity point.
Scoring framework: 1 point thesis, 1 point contextualization, 2 points evidence (at least two pieces of specific historical evidence, one of which directly supports the argument), 1 point analysis using the Continuity and Change reasoning process, 1 point complexity. Maximum 6 points. The complexity point is most often earned by integrating the political conditions (the breakdown of the Concert of Europe in 1848; the Crimean War weakening the conservative diplomatic order; Bismarck's Realpolitik), the imperial conditions (second-wave technology making the new imperialism logistically possible; great-power competition driving the partition of Africa), and the intellectual conditions (Darwinian biological materialism producing the post-1848 realist worldview and the late-century Social Darwinist racial theories) and acknowledging that the resulting late-nineteenth-century European order produced both substantial new political and economic capacity and the conditions for the catastrophic conflicts of the twentieth century. Strong responses cite specific dates, individuals, and developments rather than treating "the late nineteenth century" as a single uniform development.

English
Español
中文
हिन्दी
Français