Skip to main content
CountryReports
AP USH Unit 8 · Lesson 2 of 15CED Topic 8.2Skill 2.C: Continuity and Change~ 50 min

The Cold War from 1945 to 1980

In thirty-five years, an alliance of necessity dissolved into a global confrontation, the United States built a permanent peacetime military establishment, two superpowers came within hours of nuclear war over missiles in Cuba, and a brittle relaxation called detente cracked open over Soviet tanks in Afghanistan. This lesson traces the evolution of the Cold War from containment and the Korean War through Eisenhower's New Look, the Cuban Missile Crisis, the Nixon-Kissinger opening to China, the Helsinki Accords, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, and the Carter Doctrine that closed Period 8.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

  • Account for the way the wartime alliance with the Soviet Union dissolved between 1945 and 1947 and explain how George F. Kennan's analysis and the Truman Doctrine produced the strategy of containment.
  • Describe the Korean War (1950-1953) as the first hot test of containment, including the role of the United Nations, the 38th parallel, the dismissal of General MacArthur, and the 1953 armistice that froze the peninsula in place.
  • Explain Eisenhower's New Look defense policy, the doctrines of massive retaliation and brinkmanship associated with Secretary Dulles, and the strategic shocks of Sputnik (1957) and the U-2 incident (1960).
  • Reconstruct the thirteen days of the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962 and account for the public and secret terms by which the United States and the Soviet Union stepped back from nuclear war.
  • Account for the rise and fall of detente from 1969 to 1979, including SALT I, the Nixon openings to Beijing and Moscow, the Helsinki Accords of 1975, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979, and the Carter Doctrine of January 1980.

Key Concepts

The Cold War of 1945 to 1980 is the central story of American foreign policy in Period 8 and the dominant pressure on American domestic life across the same thirty-five years. The wartime alliance against Nazi Germany dissolved almost immediately once the common enemy was gone. The Soviet Union refused to withdraw from the territory the Red Army had liberated in Eastern Europe; Stalin installed friendly governments in Poland, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, and Czechoslovakia; and by the spring of 1946, when Winston Churchill named the dividing line an "iron curtain" in his Fulton, Missouri address, the bipolar world of the next four decades had taken its rough shape. American policymakers committed the country to the strategy that would organize their response to that world: containment, the prevention of further Soviet expansion through economic aid, collective-security pacts, and military commitments around the perimeter of the communist bloc (KC-8.1.I, KC-8.1.I.A).

Containment had two intellectual fathers. George F. Kennan, the State Department's senior Soviet specialist, set out the theory in his February 1946 "Long Telegram" from Moscow and again, anonymously, in his July 1947 Foreign Affairs article signed Mister X. Soviet expansion, Kennan argued, was driven by ideology and would yield only to long, patient, firm, and vigilant counter-pressure at every point along the perimeter of the Soviet bloc. President Truman gave the strategy its public form. In his March 12, 1947 address to a joint session of Congress, asking for four hundred million dollars in aid to Greece and Turkey, Truman pledged that the United States would support free peoples resisting subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures (KC-8.1.I.A). The Truman Doctrine was followed within months by the Marshall Plan, roughly thirteen billion dollars to rebuild the war-shattered economies of Western Europe; the Berlin Airlift of 1948-1949, which broke a Soviet blockade of the western sectors of the divided city; and the North Atlantic Treaty of April 1949, which bound the United States to the defense of Europe in the first peacetime alliance the country had ever signed. National Security Council Report 68 (NSC-68), drafted in April 1950, took the doctrine to its strategic conclusion: the United States would underwrite a massive peacetime military establishment to deter Soviet expansion globally.

NSC-68 was completed eight weeks before North Korean forces crossed the 38th parallel on June 25, 1950 and turned containment into a hot war. The Korean War ran from 1950 to 1953 and is the first major test of the new strategy (KC-8.1.I.B.i). Truman secured a United Nations mandate to defend South Korea while the Soviet Union was boycotting the Security Council; American and allied troops, fighting under United Nations command, pushed back from the Pusan Perimeter after General Douglas MacArthur's amphibious landing at Inchon in September 1950 and drove north past the 38th parallel toward the Yalu. The intervention of roughly three hundred thousand Chinese "volunteers" in late October produced a long retreat and a war of attrition along the original frontier. MacArthur's public demands for an expanded war against China produced the most consequential civil-military confrontation of the postwar era; Truman dismissed him in April 1951 in defense of the principle that elected civilians, not generals, set foreign policy. The armistice of July 1953, signed at Panmunjom, froze the peninsula along a line close to the 38th parallel. The peninsula remained divided and technically still at war into the present.

Korea reshaped the American Cold War. Defense spending tripled; the United States stationed troops permanently in West Germany and South Korea; and a Republican president elected in 1952 on a promise to end the war set out to deliver Cold War security at lower cost. Dwight D. Eisenhower's New Look defense policy trimmed conventional ground forces, enlarged the strategic nuclear arsenal and the bomber fleet of the Strategic Air Command, and assigned a larger covert role to the Central Intelligence Agency in places such as Iran (the 1953 coup against Mohammad Mossadegh) and Guatemala (the 1954 coup against Jacobo Arbenz). Secretary of State John Foster Dulles announced in January 1954 that the United States would rely on a capacity for massive retaliation, instantly and at places of its own choosing. Critics named the diplomatic style that followed brinkmanship: a willingness to walk to the edge of nuclear war to extract Soviet concessions. The doctrine produced strategic stability of a kind, and it produced two strategic shocks that the Eisenhower administration could not contain.

The first shock came in October 1957, when the Soviet Union launched Sputnik 1, the first artificial satellite. The launch was a propaganda triumph and a strategic warning: a rocket capable of placing a satellite into orbit could deliver a thermonuclear warhead to any city in the United States. Congress responded with the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 and the National Defense Education Act of the same year, which poured federal money into university science, mathematics, and foreign-language programs. The Space Race followed within months. The second shock came in May 1960, when a Soviet surface-to-air missile shot down an American U-2 reconnaissance aircraft over the Urals. Pilot Francis Gary Powers parachuted into Soviet captivity; the cover story collapsed at the Paris summit; and the sober public recognition that both superpowers were now a missile-launch away from each other helped elect John F. Kennedy in November 1960 on the false premise of a "missile gap" that favored Moscow.

Kennedy inherited the Cold War at its most dangerous edge. The Bay of Pigs invasion of April 1961, an Eisenhower-era CIA plan to land Cuban exiles on the south coast of Cuba and topple Fidel Castro, collapsed within seventy-two hours and handed Castro and the Soviet Union a public propaganda victory. In August 1961 the East German government, with Soviet approval, sealed the boundary between East and West Berlin and began construction of the Berlin Wall, which would stand until 1989 as the most visible monument of the Cold War in Europe. Fourteen months later, in October 1962, the Cold War came as close to nuclear war as it would ever come. American U-2 photography on October 14, 1962 revealed Soviet medium- and intermediate-range ballistic missile sites under construction in Cuba, ninety miles from Florida. For roughly thirteen days the world held its breath.

"It shall be the policy of this Nation to regard any nuclear missile launched from Cuba against any nation in the Western Hemisphere as an attack by the Soviet Union on the United States, requiring a full retaliatory response upon the Soviet Union."John F. Kennedy, Address on the Cuban Missile Crisis, October 22, 1962

The Cuban Missile Crisis ran from October 16, 1962, when Kennedy was first briefed, through October 28, 1962, when Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev publicly agreed to dismantle the missile sites. Kennedy's response combined a naval quarantine of Cuba (announced on October 22 in a televised address), a public ultimatum, and quiet diplomacy. The crisis ended with two understandings. The public deal was that the Soviet Union would withdraw the missiles in exchange for an American pledge not to invade Cuba. The secret deal, negotiated through Robert Kennedy and Soviet Ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin, was that the United States would, after a face-saving interval, withdraw its Jupiter intermediate-range ballistic missiles from Turkey. Khrushchev was deposed two years later, partly for accepting the trade. Kennedy was assassinated in November 1963. The two governments had stared at each other across the edge of nuclear war and stepped back. The aftermath produced the Moscow-Washington hotline (1963), the Limited Test Ban Treaty (1963), and a sober new appreciation in both capitals of how easily a Cold War standoff could escalate into mutual destruction.

The crisis also accelerated a slow Soviet-American search for stable rules. By the time Richard Nixon entered the White House in January 1969, the Vietnam War, the splitting of the communist bloc into Soviet and Chinese halves, the rough nuclear parity reached during the 1960s, and the cost of a global commitment all argued for a new posture. Nixon and his National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger called it detente: a deliberate relaxation of Cold War tensions that aimed to manage the rivalry rather than to win it. Three monuments mark the policy. In February 1972 Nixon flew to Beijing for an eight-day visit that ended twenty-three years of formal nonrecognition between the United States and the People's Republic of China. In May 1972 Nixon flew to Moscow and signed the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT I), the first agreement to cap the number of intercontinental and submarine-launched ballistic missiles each side could field, paired with the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty that froze missile-defense deployment. In August 1975, at Helsinki, thirty-five states (the United States, the Soviet Union, Canada, and every European state except Albania) signed a Final Act that recognized the postwar borders of Europe and committed all parties to a baseline of human rights, including the free movement of people and information. The Helsinki human-rights provisions, intended by Moscow as a concession of words, became the legal lever that East European dissidents and the Carter administration would use against the Soviet bloc through the rest of the decade.

Detente was already fraying when, on Christmas Day 1979, Soviet airborne forces seized Kabul. The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, intended to prop up a faltering communist government and prevent an Islamist takeover on the southern flank of the Soviet Union, ended detente as a working policy. President Jimmy Carter withdrew SALT II from the Senate, embargoed grain shipments, and called for an American boycott of the 1980 Moscow Summer Olympic Games. In his State of the Union address of January 23, 1980, Carter announced what the press immediately named the Carter Doctrine: any attempt by an outside force to gain control of the Persian Gulf region would be regarded as an assault on the vital interests of the United States and would be repelled by any means necessary, including military force. The doctrine, framed against the Soviet army in Afghanistan and the Iranian revolution that had toppled the shah a year earlier, committed the United States to the long, expensive defense of the Middle East oil flow that Period 9 would inherit. By 1980, when the period closes, the United States was rebuilding the defense budget Carter had begun and would arm the Afghan mujahideen against Soviet occupation in a covert war that ran for the next decade. The arc of the Cold War from Truman to Carter is the arc this lesson asks students to reconstruct (KC-8.1.I.A, KC-8.1.I.B.i, KC-8.1.I.C).

Primary Source Excerpts

The four excerpts below mark the four hinge moments of the Cold War in Period 8: the doctrine that opened it, the brinkmanship that set its strategic edge, the moment it almost ended in nuclear war, and the doctrine that closed Period 8 by reorganizing American commitments around the Persian Gulf.

Article Foreign Affairs 1947

George F. Kennan ("X"), "The Sources of Soviet Conduct," Foreign Affairs, July 1947

"In these circumstances it is clear that the main element of any United States policy toward the Soviet Union must be that of a long-term, patient but firm and vigilant containment of Russian expansive tendencies. The Soviet pressure against the free institutions of the western world is something that can be contained by the adroit and vigilant application of counter-force at a series of constantly shifting geographical and political points."

Kennan's anonymous July 1947 article, signed Mister X, is the founding document of the strategy of containment. Drawing on his February 1946 Long Telegram from Moscow and on twenty years of diplomatic service in the Soviet Union, Kennan argued that Soviet expansion was driven by ideology and the regime's need for a foreign enemy, and that it would not yield to a single decisive blow but only to patient pressure at every point along the Soviet perimeter. The article appeared four months after Truman had publicly announced the same conclusion in his Greece-Turkey speech. Containment as a strategy organized American Cold War policy from 1947 forward; later presidents would interpret it differently, but the framework Kennan articulated remained intact through Carter.

George F. Kennan ("X"), The Sources of Soviet Conduct, Foreign Affairs, vol. 25, no. 4, July 1947, pp. 566-582. View at Foreign Affairs →
Speech U.S. Department of State 1954

John Foster Dulles, Address on Massive Retaliation, January 12, 1954

"We need allies and collective security. Our purpose is to make these relations more effective, less costly. This can be done by placing more reliance on deterrent power and less dependence on local defensive power. The way to deter aggression is for the free community to be willing and able to respond vigorously at places and with means of its own choosing."

Secretary of State Dulles delivered this address to the Council on Foreign Relations on January 12, 1954, six months after the Korean armistice. The speech announced the Eisenhower administration's New Look defense policy in its public form: the United States would no longer match every Soviet probe with a corresponding conventional buildup, but would rely on the threat of massive retaliation, delivered by the strategic nuclear arsenal of the Strategic Air Command, to deter Soviet aggression across the entire perimeter of the communist bloc. The doctrine reduced the dollar cost of Cold War defense in the short run, but it produced the missile-gap fears of the late 1950s, the U-2 program, and ultimately the brinkmanship style that the press would name and the Cuban Missile Crisis would test.

John Foster Dulles, The Evolution of Foreign Policy, Address before the Council on Foreign Relations, January 12, 1954. U.S. Department of State Bulletin, January 25, 1954. View at Office of the Historian →
Speech JFK Presidential Library 1962

John F. Kennedy, Address on the Cuban Missile Crisis, October 22, 1962

"This Government, as promised, has maintained the closest surveillance of the Soviet military buildup on the island of Cuba. Within the past week, unmistakable evidence has established the fact that a series of offensive missile sites is now in preparation on that imprisoned island. The purpose of these bases can be none other than to provide a nuclear strike capability against the Western Hemisphere."

Kennedy's October 22, 1962 televised address to the nation announced the discovery of Soviet medium- and intermediate-range ballistic missile sites in Cuba and the American response: a naval quarantine of the island and an ultimatum that the missiles must be removed. The address was the public face of a thirteen-day crisis whose private negotiations went almost to the brink. The crisis ended on October 28 when Khrushchev publicly agreed to withdraw the missiles in exchange for an American pledge not to invade Cuba and a private American pledge to remove Jupiter missiles from Turkey. The episode produced the Moscow-Washington hotline of 1963, the Limited Test Ban Treaty of 1963, and a sober understanding in both capitals that the brinkmanship of the New Look era had to give way to managed, rules-based competition.

John F. Kennedy, Radio and Television Report to the American People on the Soviet Arms Buildup in Cuba, October 22, 1962. JFK Presidential Library and Museum. View at JFK Library →
Speech American Presidency Project 1980

Jimmy Carter, State of the Union Address (Carter Doctrine), January 23, 1980

"Let our position be absolutely clear: An attempt by any outside force to gain control of the Persian Gulf region will be regarded as an assault on the vital interests of the United States of America, and such an assault will be repelled by any means necessary, including military force."

Carter delivered this address to a joint session of Congress on January 23, 1980, four weeks after Soviet airborne forces had seized Kabul on December 25, 1979 and three months into the Iran hostage crisis that had begun on November 4, 1979. The speech announced what the press immediately named the Carter Doctrine: a public commitment to defend the Persian Gulf against any outside power. The doctrine reorganized American Cold War commitments around the oil flow that the OPEC embargo of 1973 had made the volatile frontier of American foreign policy. It also closed Period 8 on a hawkish note that Ronald Reagan would inherit and expand: detente was over, the defense budget was rising again, and the United States would arm the Afghan mujahideen in a covert war that ran for the next decade.

Jimmy Carter, State of the Union Address Delivered Before a Joint Session of the Congress, January 23, 1980. American Presidency Project, University of California, Santa Barbara. View at American Presidency Project →

Discussion Questions

  1. (Causation) Trace the causal chain from the dissolution of the wartime alliance with the Soviet Union in 1945 and 1946 to the formal commitment of the Truman Doctrine in March 1947. At which step in the chain do you think a different decision could have produced a different outcome, and why?
  2. (Continuity and Change) Compare the containment strategy as Truman practiced it (1947-1953) with the New Look version Eisenhower and Dulles practiced (1953-1961). Identify two continuities and two significant shifts. Which set is more historically consequential?
  3. (Causation) Account for how the Cuban Missile Crisis ended without a nuclear exchange. What weight do you give the public quarantine, the secret Jupiter-missile trade, the Khrushchev-Kennedy back-channel correspondence, and the willingness of both leaders to accept domestic political costs to step back?
  4. (Comparison) Compare detente under Nixon and Kissinger (1969-1974) with the harder anti-Soviet line that returned under Carter after December 1979. What does the comparison reveal about the relationship between superpower competition and domestic political pressure?
  5. (Continuity and Change) The Helsinki Accords of 1975 recognized postwar European borders that the United States had refused to recognize for thirty years. Was Helsinki a Soviet diplomatic victory, an American moral victory through the human-rights provisions, or both at once? Defend a clear claim with specific evidence.

Classroom Activities

15 min

Cold War Causal Chain

On the board, draw a horizontal arrow labeled 1945 on the left and 1980 on the right. Working in pairs, students place ten events along the chain (Yalta, Iron Curtain speech, Truman Doctrine, NATO, Korea, Sputnik, Cuban Missile Crisis, SALT I, Helsinki, Afghanistan invasion). Each pair labels the strongest causal arrow between two events and defends the choice in one sentence.

25 min

Thirteen Days, Two Tracks

Distribute a timeline of the Cuban Missile Crisis (October 14-28, 1962) split into two parallel tracks: public diplomacy on the top, private back-channel on the bottom. Students annotate each entry with the document or event that supports it. They finish by writing one paragraph on the question of whether the public or the private track did more to end the crisis.

20 min

Containment Doctrines Compared

Divide the class into four groups, one for each of Truman, Eisenhower-Dulles, Nixon-Kissinger, and Carter. Each group writes a short statement of how its president understood containment, the principal instrument it favored (alliance, nuclear deterrent, diplomacy, military posture), and one event that illustrates the doctrine in practice. Groups present in chronological order; the class then negotiates which doctrine showed the most internal continuity with Kennan's original.

25 min

Helsinki Final Act Annotation

Project the Helsinki Final Act of 1975 in three baskets (security, economic cooperation, human rights). In small groups, students annotate each basket with one Soviet objective and one American objective. Each group writes a one-paragraph caption explaining how the Helsinki human-rights basket later became a lever against the Soviet bloc, citing one example from East European dissident activity between 1976 and 1980.

Vocabulary

The American Cold War strategy, articulated by George F. Kennan and announced by Harry Truman, of preventing further Soviet expansion through economic aid, collective security pacts, and military commitments around the perimeter of the communist bloc.
The 1947 commitment, announced in Truman's address to Congress on Greece and Turkey, to support free peoples resisting subjugation by armed minorities or outside pressures.
The 1948-1952 American program of roughly thirteen billion dollars in aid to rebuild the war-shattered economies of Western Europe and bind them to the United States.
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization, established in April 1949, the first peacetime military alliance the United States had ever signed, binding it to the defense of Western Europe.
National Security Council Report 68, drafted in April 1950, which committed the United States to a massive peacetime military establishment to deter Soviet expansion globally.
The 1950-1953 hot war on the Korean peninsula, fought under United Nations command, that ended in the armistice of July 1953 and froze the peninsula along a line close to the 38th parallel.
The line of latitude that divided North and South Korea after 1945 and along which the Korean War armistice of 1953 froze the boundary between the two states.
The Eisenhower administration's defense policy of trimming conventional ground forces while enlarging the strategic nuclear arsenal and expanding covert operations through the Central Intelligence Agency.
The doctrine, announced by Secretary of State John Foster Dulles in January 1954, that the United States would respond to Soviet aggression instantly and at places of its own choosing with the full weight of its strategic nuclear arsenal.
The diplomatic style associated with Dulles and the New Look defense policy, defined as the willingness to walk to the edge of nuclear war to extract concessions from the Soviet Union.
The first artificial satellite, launched by the Soviet Union in October 1957, whose strategic implications produced the National Defense Education Act of 1958 and the Space Race.
The May 1960 downing of an American U-2 reconnaissance aircraft over the Soviet Union, which ended the Paris summit between Eisenhower and Khrushchev and underscored the precarious nuclear balance of the late 1950s.
The April 1961 Central Intelligence Agency operation to land Cuban exiles on the south coast of Cuba and overthrow Fidel Castro, which collapsed within seventy-two hours and handed the Soviet Union a propaganda victory.
The barrier built by the East German government with Soviet approval in August 1961 to seal the boundary between East and West Berlin, which stood until 1989 as the most visible monument of the Cold War.
The thirteen-day confrontation in October 1962 over Soviet medium- and intermediate-range ballistic missile sites in Cuba, the closest the Cold War came to nuclear war, ended by a Soviet missile withdrawal and a secret American pledge to remove Jupiter missiles from Turkey.
The relaxation of Cold War tensions pursued by Nixon and Kissinger between 1969 and 1979, anchored in SALT I, the opening to China, and the Helsinki Accords, that ended with the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.
The Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty of May 1972, the first agreement to cap the number of intercontinental and submarine-launched ballistic missiles each superpower could field, signed in Moscow alongside the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty.
The 1975 Final Act signed by thirty-five states that recognized the postwar borders of Europe and committed all parties to a baseline of human rights, including the free movement of people and information.
The January 1980 commitment, announced by Carter after the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, to defend the Persian Gulf region against any outside power by any means necessary, including military force.

Standards Alignment

Draft alignment — pending educator review. AP USH codes correspond to the official College Board Course and Exam Description (Effective Fall 2023, Version 1). Statements below are paraphrased in the CountryReports voice; refer to the College Board's published CED for verbatim wording.

AP US History CED-ALIGNED

Theme

WORAmerica in the World — the global reach of containment, the alliance system, the proxy and hot wars of the Cold War, and the diplomatic management of superpower rivalry.

Historical Thinking Skill and Reasoning Process

Skill 2.CAccount for the relative historical significance of specific causes for an event or development.
Reasoning 3Continuity and Change — account for patterns of continuity and change across the Cold War from 1945 to 1980.

Learning Objective

LO 8.BAccount for the causes and effects of the Cold War on the United States from 1945 to 1980.

Key Concepts

KC-8.1.IU.S. policymakers entered into a Cold War with the authoritarian Soviet Union, working to limit the growth of communist military power and ideological influence, build a free-market global economy, and create an international security system.
KC-8.1.I.AContainment guided American foreign policy, generating military and economic commitments to allies and producing a costly nuclear arms race that defined the strategic posture of both superpowers.
KC-8.1.I.B.iThe United States fought Cold War conflicts in Korea and Vietnam intended to halt the spread of communism; both wars produced significant divisions inside the United States and shaped subsequent foreign policy.
KC-8.1.I.CPostwar decolonization and the rise of nationalist movements in Asia and Africa drew both superpowers into a search for allies among newly independent states, many of which preferred nonalignment.
National Cross-Walks
NCSS Theme 9Global Connections — the Cold War as a global system of alliances, proxy wars, arms-control diplomacy, and economic competition.
NCSS Theme 6Power, Authority, and Governance — the expansion of executive war powers across Korea, the Cuban Missile Crisis, and the strategic-arms negotiations.
NCSS Theme 5Individuals, Groups, and Institutions — the rise of the National Security Council, the Central Intelligence Agency, and the permanent peacetime military establishment.
C3 D2.His.14.9-12Account for the impact of historical context on multiple interpretations of historical developments.
C3 D2.Civ.13.9-12Evaluate public policies in terms of intended and unintended outcomes and related consequences.
CCSS RH.11-12.1Cite specific textual evidence from primary and secondary sources to support analysis.
CCSS RH.11-12.6Evaluate authors' differing points of view on the same historical event by assessing the authors' claims, reasoning, and evidence.
Discipline-Specific National Standards
NSH Era 9 · Std 2AAccount for the international origins and domestic consequences of the Cold War.
NSH Era 9 · Std 2BAccount for United States foreign policy from the Truman Doctrine through the Carter Doctrine.
NSH Era 9 · Std 2CAccount for the role of the Korean War and the Cuban Missile Crisis in defining the strategic edge of the Cold War.
NCGE Std 13The forces of cooperation and conflict that shape divisions of the Earth's surface — the bipolar alliance system and the nonaligned movement.
NCSS Theme 7Production, Distribution, and Consumption — defense spending and the postwar military-industrial complex as engines of regional growth.
Other Assessment Frameworks
NAEP US History · G8 / G12Theme 4: The Changing Role of America in the World — the United States as Cold War superpower, alliance leader, and architect of strategic-arms diplomacy.
AP World HistoryCross-reference Unit 8 (Cold War and Decolonization) — the bipolar order, decolonization, and the nonaligned movement.
AP Government and PoliticsCross-reference Unit 2 (Interactions Among Branches) — congressional response to executive war powers, including the War Powers Resolution of 1973.

AP Practice Questions

Multiple Choice Sample ~ 2 min
1Question: The Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 ended with which of the following set of terms?
  • (A) A public Soviet pledge to dismantle the missile sites in Cuba in exchange for an American invasion of the island.
  • (B) A public Soviet pledge to dismantle the missile sites in Cuba in exchange for an American non-invasion pledge, paired with a secret American pledge to remove Jupiter missiles from Turkey.
  • (C) A public Soviet pledge to dismantle the missile sites in Cuba in exchange for the immediate withdrawal of all American forces from West Berlin.
  • (D) A multilateral United Nations agreement that placed the missile sites under joint American-Soviet inspection for ten years.
  • (E) The signing of the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT I) and the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty.

Correct: (B). Khrushchev publicly agreed on October 28, 1962 to withdraw the missiles in exchange for an American pledge not to invade Cuba; Robert Kennedy and Soviet Ambassador Dobrynin negotiated the secret Jupiter-missile understanding through a separate channel. The episode produced the Moscow-Washington hotline (1963) and the Limited Test Ban Treaty (1963), but not SALT I, which followed a decade later (KC-8.1.I.A; LO 8.B; Skill 2.C).

Short Answer Question ~ 12 min · 1 page
2Question: Using your knowledge of United States foreign policy from 1945 to 1980, answer all three parts that follow.
  1. Identify ONE specific way the strategy of containment shaped American foreign policy between 1947 and 1953.
  2. Explain ONE specific way Eisenhower's New Look defense policy differed from the containment posture Truman had adopted.
  3. Explain ONE specific cause of the end of detente between 1975 and 1980.

Scoring: 1 point for each part. Strong responses to part (a) name the Truman Doctrine of 1947, the Marshall Plan of 1948, the Berlin Airlift of 1948-1949, the founding of NATO in 1949, NSC-68 of April 1950, or the American intervention in Korea in June 1950 (KC-8.1.I.A, KC-8.1.I.B.i). Part (b) responses might cite the New Look's reduction of conventional ground forces, its enlargement of the strategic nuclear arsenal, its reliance on massive retaliation as announced by Dulles in January 1954, or its expanded covert role for the Central Intelligence Agency in places such as Iran (1953) and Guatemala (1954) (KC-8.1.I.A). Part (c) responses might cite the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in December 1979, the Iranian revolution and hostage crisis of 1979, the SALT II withdrawal from the Senate in January 1980, or the Carter Doctrine of January 1980 (KC-8.1.I.C).

Document-Based Question Stem ~ 60 min · 7 documents
3Prompt: Account for the extent to which the strategy of containment governed American Cold War policy between 1945 and 1980. Build your argument with evidence drawn from the seven documents and from your own knowledge of the period.

The full seven-document set for this DBQ lives in the Unit 8 practice exam packet (Document A: Kennan, "The Sources of Soviet Conduct," 1947; Document B: Truman, Special Message on Greece and Turkey, 1947; Document C: NSC-68, April 1950; Document D: Dulles, Address on Massive Retaliation, January 1954; Document E: Kennedy, Address on the Cuban Missile Crisis, October 1962; Document F: Nixon-Brezhnev SALT I Joint Communique, May 1972; Document G: Carter, State of the Union, January 1980).

Scoring framework: 1 point thesis, 1 point contextualization, up to 4 points evidence (at least 3 documents used to support the argument, plus an outside-evidence point), 1 point sourcing (point of view, purpose, situation, audience for at least three documents), 1 point complexity. Maximum 7 points.

Long Essay Question Stem ~ 40 min
4Prompt: Account for the continuities and shifts in American Cold War policy between 1945 and 1980. In your response, defend a clear claim with specific historical evidence drawn from at least three of the developments listed below: the Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan, the Korean War, Eisenhower's New Look and massive retaliation, the Cuban Missile Crisis, detente under Nixon and Kissinger, the Helsinki Accords, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, and the Carter Doctrine.

Scoring framework: 1 point thesis, 1 point contextualization, 2 points evidence (at least two pieces of specific historical evidence, one of which directly supports the argument), 1 point analysis using the Continuity and Change reasoning process, 1 point complexity. Maximum 6 points.